Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

275 ms

laurelandelm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit laurelandelm.com now to see the best up-to-date Laurelandelm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laurelandelm.com

Visit laurelandelm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Laurelandelm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laurelandelm.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,310 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.195

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.laurelandelm.com

223 ms

Ao6Xd1slCO0r9yEQRMdyWy0howKr_XKRMK4O0FU671Xfe0bgfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9X5ewXwDmKZQsKw28cjAsKFRMkF2btFy7eMPG0deNkjPuGda4DifoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCdeBuScmCjAoqZAUlOcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCdeNkjPuGda4DifoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCiaiaOcUyiW48deB0ZemCdPoRdhXCiaiaOcUzScIl-eNkSab0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicI7fbRKHyMMeMw6MKG4fHvgIMMjgfMfH6qJK3IbMg6YJMHbMSD7TzIB.js

60 ms

css2

160 ms

legacy.js

68 ms

modern.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Laurelandelm.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 30% (11 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) relates to the external source Static1.squarespace.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.5 kB (49%)

Content Size

97.7 kB

After Optimization

50.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Laurelandelm.com main page is 97.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 53.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.3 kB

  • Original 53.4 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 17.4 kB
  • After minification 11.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Laurelandelm needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (58%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laurelandelm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

laurelandelm.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

laurelandelm.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

laurelandelm.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laurelandelm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Laurelandelm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laurelandelm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: