Tools & Wizards About Us
lavitanova.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

366 ms

lavitanova.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit lavitanova.ru now to see the best up-to-date Lavitanova content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lavitanova.ru

Visit lavitanova.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Lavitanova.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lavitanova.ru performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lavitanova.ru

3065 ms

style.css

315 ms

button.css

287 ms

form.css

282 ms

font-awesome.css

304 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Lavitanova.ru, 9% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lavitanova.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 786.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lavitanova.ru main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 51.2 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 64.7 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 134.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lavitanova images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 414.1 kB

  • Original 631.6 kB
  • After minification 589.6 kB
  • After compression 217.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 414.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 186.5 kB

  • Original 218.2 kB
  • After minification 173.1 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lavitanova.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (76%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lavitanova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lavitanova.ru

lavitanova.ru

3065 ms

style.css

style.css

315 ms

button.css

button.css

287 ms

form.css

form.css

282 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

304 ms

style.css

style.css

286 ms

styles.css

styles.css

283 ms

style.css

style.css

432 ms

style.css

style.css

423 ms

style.css

style.css

429 ms

footable.core.min.css

footable.core.min.css

434 ms

footable.metro.min.css

footable.metro.min.css

437 ms

wp-special-textboxes.css.php

wp-special-textboxes.css.php

2209 ms

uamAdmin.css

uamAdmin.css

564 ms

uamLoginForm.css

uamLoginForm.css

561 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

924 ms

all.js

all.js

281 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

82 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

26 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

581 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

578 ms

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.9.js

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.9.js

706 ms

usernoise.js

usernoise.js

710 ms

button.js

button.js

722 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

721 ms

callback.js

callback.js

853 ms

footable.min.js

footable.min.js

864 ms

footable.sort.min.js

footable.sort.min.js

868 ms

script.js

script.js

1037 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

1008 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1015 ms

vslider.js

vslider.js

1019 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

1061 ms

highslide-with-html.packed.js

highslide-with-html.packed.js

1284 ms

grey_blocks.css

grey_blocks.css

1159 ms

cforms.js

cforms.js

1161 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1459 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1208 ms

dcdrilldown.css

dcdrilldown.css

1295 ms

all.js

all.js

315 ms

faceboxmodal.css

faceboxmodal.css

1199 ms

faceboxmodal.js

faceboxmodal.js

1101 ms

jquery.ui.effect.min.js

jquery.ui.effect.min.js

1156 ms

jquery.ui.effect-blind.min.js

jquery.ui.effect-blind.min.js

1166 ms

wstb.min.js

wstb.min.js

1186 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

1247 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1271 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

34 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

161 ms

117 ms

page.jpeg

page.jpeg

836 ms

object267906574.png

object267906574.png

144 ms

object943040694.png

object943040694.png

143 ms

object292689342.png

object292689342.png

142 ms

object1288380598.png

object1288380598.png

141 ms

object353138747.png

object353138747.png

141 ms

object904024490.png

object904024490.png

559 ms

object288274236.png

object288274236.png

822 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

292 ms

nav.png

nav.png

293 ms

menuseparator.png

menuseparator.png

289 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

422 ms

vmenuitem.png

vmenuitem.png

445 ms

twitt.gif

twitt.gif

405 ms

postbullets.png

postbullets.png

534 ms

pregnant_husb.jpg

pregnant_husb.jpg

824 ms

211.jpg

211.jpg

558 ms

gen_mut.jpg

gen_mut.jpg

1225 ms

21.jpg

21.jpg

1492 ms

genetika.jpg

genetika.jpg

699 ms

gormonalnaja_kontracepcija.jpg

gormonalnaja_kontracepcija.jpg

840 ms

searchicon.png

searchicon.png

925 ms

watch.js

watch.js

195 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

148 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

268 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

14 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

69 ms

ok.png

ok.png

884 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

81 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

905 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

622 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

63 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

20 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

35 ms

like.php

like.php

121 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

37 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

37 ms

watch.js

watch.js

465 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

298 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

333 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

91 ms

1

1

91 ms

rounded-white.png

rounded-white.png

150 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

141 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

140 ms

Accessibility Review

lavitanova.ru accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lavitanova.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lavitanova.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lavitanova.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lavitanova.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lavitanova.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lavitanova. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: