3 sec in total
518 ms
2.3 sec
225 ms
Click here to check amazing Layer 42 content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about layer42.net
Managed colocation services provide reliable networking, power, physical security for a cost-effective business continuity and disaster recovery solution.
Visit layer42.netWe analyzed Layer42.net page load time and found that the first response time was 518 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
layer42.net performance score
518 ms
25 ms
41 ms
356 ms
634 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Layer42.net, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Layer42.net.
Page size can be reduced by 741.4 kB (30%)
2.5 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Layer42.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Layer 42 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 430.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Layer42.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (39%)
61
37
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Layer 42. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
layer42.net
518 ms
css
25 ms
css
41 ms
reset.css
356 ms
style.css
634 ms
font-awesome.min.css
425 ms
core.css
218 ms
fullwidth.css
216 ms
settings.css
495 ms
skin.css
355 ms
skin2.css
297 ms
accordion.css
372 ms
tabs.css
428 ms
fadeeffect.css
425 ms
responsive.css
447 ms
mainbg.jpg
709 ms
swirls.png
1738 ms
3sqrs.png
915 ms
learnmore.png
450 ms
mainbg2.jpg
711 ms
server.png
833 ms
learnhow.png
693 ms
mainbg3.jpg
909 ms
touch.png
977 ms
starthow.png
731 ms
col.png
774 ms
eth.png
836 ms
ips.png
844 ms
wav.png
911 ms
readmore.png
906 ms
sup.png
909 ms
sal.png
913 ms
face.png
973 ms
twit.png
975 ms
link.png
980 ms
jquery.js
1058 ms
jquery-1.js
984 ms
styleselector.js
1040 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
979 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
1053 ms
selectnav.js
987 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
967 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
913 ms
scripts.js
938 ms
tabs.js
921 ms
custom.js
907 ms
core.js
910 ms
divider.png
965 ms
support.jpg
738 ms
login.jpg
738 ms
logo.png
745 ms
arr.png
640 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
32 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
60 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSo3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
71 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
74 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-ho3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
70 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
633 ms
sVvvcJDRTINJla2R4XwPVevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
70 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
68 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
65 ms
suport.png
639 ms
network.png
651 ms
mail.png
595 ms
sales.png
570 ms
scroll-top-arrow.png
567 ms
loader.gif
96 ms
timer.png
119 ms
large_left.png
78 ms
large_right.png
71 ms
layer42.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Layer42.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Layer42.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
layer42.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Layer 42. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: