14.8 sec in total
4.5 sec
9.4 sec
895 ms
Click here to check amazing Layergloss content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about layergloss.com
Products Archive | DS
Visit layergloss.comWe analyzed Layergloss.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.5 sec and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
layergloss.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
4547 ms
3721 ms
3856 ms
4069 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Layergloss.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Layergloss.com.
Page size can be reduced by 41.8 kB (4%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Layergloss.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Layergloss images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)
19
15
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Layergloss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
layergloss.com
4547 ms
hY9dDsIgEIQv1Lr2Hr55AIKwKgZYwlCb3l5KTCoxxrfdb36SmeikV85n7yxnQtHFGTIA-Q2j4eFIl-zsjau-et7fzXeVWEa9MCR8g0Nwsbe3BtyZyw9N2TXq4EwvZUaSCPfkPzG1O4eJHlBGQhLUbRrggpb4wH2VmVEkqHoOSxpNXcKx0Jy8aNvF3s4X.css
3721 ms
jYzLCYBADAUb0g1iG96sIOhjifsRk3jY7kXxKngbBmZG2o4T2rrxhb5IVHaEIrUbaOIGnbOsUDJnl4U2o3xbe2xICvZTuWAVDu_tK4wKVNuX9GvtytXEZa92AQ.js
3856 ms
dY5RDoIwEEQvJC344RH8NuEABugIC1u2dNsQby_GmEiCnzPzZjKlbSO5HnZUu4hDwTThVP64gXNPs-68ccmIT9M1UfI1wtXg4mLOptpRDO9lLpTJIR71H5n51vQwnuaj3EtWrAPA_4gkuRvqlcJno9qieyc-iCLaRhVpu0GtJZUkAdaRpq8wYerdu_YC.js
4069 ms
js
63 ms
ZcpbDoAgDETRDanVxP2QCtVALBBaEt29jy8Nn3PmjrAU7zaCIOBoxbqrcWdE9rYb229gH39uq2hiE6SbwSZmitoXyvvZlBjweHG6l7nbnIQKoAipPMFHzVpS1As.js
3778 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
37 ms
layergloss-logo-dark.png
378 ms
layergloss-logo-white.png
377 ms
home-header-v2.jpg
642 ms
appowr-section2.png
403 ms
appoictainment-section4.png
542 ms
heart-icon2.png
378 ms
lg-icon2.png
400 ms
mobile-icon3.png
480 ms
startup-bootcamp.png
480 ms
wired.png
479 ms
the-next-web.png
479 ms
c5a7f89e-15b6-49a9-8259-5ea665e72191.woff
609 ms
b8e906a1-f5e8-4bf1-8e80-82c646ca4d5f.woff
518 ms
9949035f-6226-4080-a14a-bf7d94ffb1e1.woff
609 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
671 ms
logo.png
351 ms
layergloss.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
layergloss.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
layergloss.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Layergloss.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Layergloss.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
layergloss.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Layergloss. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: