Tools & Wizards About Us
layerwp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

layerwp.com

LayerWP WordPress Product Directory, Reviews, Tips & More

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

360 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

layerwp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing LayerWP content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about layerwp.com

View the WordPress product directory, find something new. Or why not read reviews of WordPress products, get some tips and more on LayerWP.

Visit layerwp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Layerwp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

layerwp.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

layerwp.com

360 ms

layerwp.com

82 ms

style.min.css

47 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

165 ms

wp-ulike-pro.min.css

267 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Layerwp.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.usefathom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Layerwp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

458.6 kB

After Optimization

356.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Layerwp.com main page is 458.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 335.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 102.4 kB

  • Original 121.1 kB
  • After minification 117.9 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 335.7 kB
  • After minification 335.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LayerWP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LayerWP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

layerwp.com

layerwp.com

360 ms

layerwp.com

layerwp.com

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

wp-ulike.min.css

165 ms

wp-ulike-pro.min.css

wp-ulike-pro.min.css

267 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

159 ms

simplelightbox.min.css

simplelightbox.min.css

209 ms

menu-addon.css

menu-addon.css

251 ms

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

89 ms

style-blocks-column.css

style-blocks-column.css

126 ms

style-blocks-spacer.css

style-blocks-spacer.css

171 ms

style-blocks-advancedbtn.css

style-blocks-advancedbtn.css

242 ms

style-blocks-image.css

style-blocks-image.css

220 ms

script.js

script.js

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

220 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

251 ms

ab34ae3ef1c272413a317af8bc5aa84c.css

ab34ae3ef1c272413a317af8bc5aa84c.css

294 ms

header.min.css

header.min.css

249 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

318 ms

footer.min.css

footer.min.css

288 ms

style.css

style.css

300 ms

g5c5.css

g5c5.css

295 ms

wp-ulike-pro.min.js

wp-ulike-pro.min.js

300 ms

simplelightbox.min.js

simplelightbox.min.js

422 ms

lightbox-init.min.js

lightbox-init.min.js

438 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

423 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

435 ms

pminstantpage.min.js

pminstantpage.min.js

424 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

424 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

438 ms

layout.js

layout.js

436 ms

layerwp-logo1.svg

layerwp-logo1.svg

193 ms

layerwp_home1.svg

layerwp_home1.svg

187 ms

layerwp-black-friday-deal-768x432.webp

layerwp-black-friday-deal-768x432.webp

205 ms

screenshot-weareag-co-uk-product-lloyds-cardnet-connect-for-woocommerce-1701436385953-768x504.png

screenshot-weareag-co-uk-product-lloyds-cardnet-connect-for-woocommerce-1701436385953-768x504.png

167 ms

rb-share-image-768x432.jpg

rb-share-image-768x432.jpg

76 ms

webba-banner-768x434.jpg

webba-banner-768x434.jpg

90 ms

AI-Powered-SEO-Keyword-Tool1-768x432.jpg

AI-Powered-SEO-Keyword-Tool1-768x432.jpg

63 ms

WordPress-Website-Toolkit-Part-31-768x403.jpg

WordPress-Website-Toolkit-Part-31-768x403.jpg

102 ms

WordPress-Website-Toolkit-Part-21-768x403.jpg

WordPress-Website-Toolkit-Part-21-768x403.jpg

44 ms

WordPress-Website-Toolkit1-768x403.jpg

WordPress-Website-Toolkit1-768x403.jpg

99 ms

Strong-Testimonials-Plugin-Review-11-768x432.webp

Strong-Testimonials-Plugin-Review-11-768x432.webp

124 ms

Helpful-Content-Update-WordPress1-768x432.webp

Helpful-Content-Update-WordPress1-768x432.webp

152 ms

ColorKit-Review1-768x403.jpg

ColorKit-Review1-768x403.jpg

281 ms

QuotesDLX-Review1-768x432.webp

QuotesDLX-Review1-768x432.webp

1334 ms

layerwp1.png

layerwp1.png

252 ms

Accessibility Review

layerwp.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

layerwp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

layerwp.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Layerwp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Layerwp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

layerwp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LayerWP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: