Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

ldpebag.com

Pharmaceutical Packaging Pouches | API Plastic Pharma Bags

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

323 ms

ldpebag.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ldpebag content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ldpebag.com

Pharmaceutical packaging pouches, bags for bulk Drug & API Packaging. API plastic bags supplier in India for medical, healthcare & pharmaceutical packaging.

Visit ldpebag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ldpebag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ldpebag.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,170 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.978

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ldpebag.com

2992 ms

reset.css

609 ms

defaults.css

610 ms

style.css

613 ms

styles.css

606 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Ldpebag.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ldpebag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.2 kB (38%)

Content Size

438.5 kB

After Optimization

273.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Ldpebag.com main page is 438.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 195.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 27.2 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 195.1 kB
  • After minification 189.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ldpebag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 100.5 kB

  • Original 169.9 kB
  • After minification 166.1 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 30.2 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ldpebag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (40%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ldpebag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ldpebag.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ldpebag.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ldpebag.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ldpebag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ldpebag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ldpebag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: