4.8 sec in total
163 ms
4.4 sec
320 ms
Welcome to leading-edge.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Leading Edge best content right away, or after learning these important things about leading-edge.co.uk
Visit leading-edge.co.ukWe analyzed Leading-edge.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
leading-edge.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value3,500 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
163 ms
1127 ms
79 ms
171 ms
312 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Leading-edge.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (24%)
5.6 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Leading-edge.co.uk main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 518.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Leading Edge needs image optimization as it can save up to 518.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 383.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.3 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 372.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leading-edge.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 372.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (60%)
62
25
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leading Edge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
leading-edge.co.uk
163 ms
www.leading-edge.co.uk
1127 ms
gtm.js
79 ms
styles.css
171 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
312 ms
frontend.min.css
469 ms
flatpickr.min.css
246 ms
select2.min.css
318 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
248 ms
main.css
320 ms
sassy-social-share-public.css
330 ms
frontend.css
331 ms
gdpr-main.css
472 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
553 ms
flatpickr.min.js
405 ms
select2.min.js
485 ms
font-awesome.min.css
55 ms
aos.css
54 ms
aos.js
79 ms
custom.css
484 ms
frontend.min.js
484 ms
index.js
546 ms
index.js
552 ms
frontend.min.js
571 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
568 ms
plugins.js
572 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
632 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
631 ms
main.js
635 ms
sassy-social-share-public.js
842 ms
api.js
95 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
653 ms
index.js
655 ms
frontend.js
714 ms
main.js
713 ms
css2
33 ms
fontawesome.min.css
406 ms
brands.css
426 ms
solid.css
432 ms
regular.css
488 ms
css2
48 ms
ctf-sprite.png
112 ms
leading-edge-logo.png
111 ms
england-rugby-190x95.png
112 ms
thefa-england-football-association-logo-95x95.png
113 ms
landrover-jaguar-220x70.png
113 ms
1280px-TalkTalk_Group_logo.svg_-220x48.png
112 ms
levis-logo-190x95.png
182 ms
wickes-logo-177x95.png
200 ms
insight-logo-209x95.png
199 ms
southampton-fc-83x95.png
200 ms
Whitbread-220x25.png
200 ms
Glanbia-192x95.png
201 ms
Halfords-220x52.png
263 ms
wru-logo-1-72x95.png
270 ms
ninetyone.png
273 ms
eightsix.png
274 ms
ninetytwo.png
277 ms
gdpr-logo.png
275 ms
introbanner.jpg
355 ms
Girlstalking.png
645 ms
rugby-scrum.jpg
577 ms
Guystalking.png
586 ms
Meeting.png
731 ms
triangle-1.svg
351 ms
font
71 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
64 ms
font
1210 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
250 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
263 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
336 ms
recaptcha__en.js
77 ms
leading-edge.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
leading-edge.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
leading-edge.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leading-edge.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Leading-edge.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leading-edge.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Leading Edge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: