Tools & Wizards About Us
leadingtechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

leadingtechnology.com

Leading Technology Group - Accelerating Medical Research

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

655 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

leadingtechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Visit leadingtechnology.com now to see the best up-to-date Leading Technology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leadingtechnology.com

A family investment group with over 20 years experience investing in the medical research, life sciences and software industries.

Visit leadingtechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Leadingtechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 655 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leadingtechnology.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

leadingtechnology.com

655 ms

leadingtechnology.com

1090 ms

styles.css

217 ms

grid.min.css

433 ms

helper-parts.min.css

649 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Leadingtechnology.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Leadingtechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 143.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Leadingtechnology.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 101.3 kB

  • Original 124.5 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 974.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leading Technology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 216.8 kB
  • After compression 215.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (78%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leading Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

leadingtechnology.com

leadingtechnology.com

655 ms

leadingtechnology.com

leadingtechnology.com

1090 ms

styles.css

styles.css

217 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

433 ms

helper-parts.min.css

helper-parts.min.css

649 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

862 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

643 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

651 ms

style.css

style.css

652 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

655 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

858 ms

style.css

style.css

872 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

874 ms

kiko-all.css

kiko-all.css

875 ms

font-awesome-5.min.css

font-awesome-5.min.css

876 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

1736 ms

print.css

print.css

1075 ms

style_dynamic_callback.css

style_dynamic_callback.css

1081 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

1299 ms

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.css

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.css

1087 ms

css

css

41 ms

core-dashboard.min.css

core-dashboard.min.css

1088 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1291 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1303 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1309 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

1309 ms

global.css

global.css

1506 ms

post-969.css

post-969.css

1513 ms

style.css

style.css

1515 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1759 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1524 ms

css

css

38 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1722 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1726 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1728 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

1758 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1938 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1940 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1942 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

index.js

index.js

1944 ms

index.js

index.js

1741 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1749 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1958 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1528 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1530 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

1516 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1526 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

1523 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

1521 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1520 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1522 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1521 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1723 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1531 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1523 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

1524 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

1522 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1522 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1514 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1511 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1513 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

1520 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

1322 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

1517 ms

style.css

style.css

1517 ms

smoothPageScroll.min.js

smoothPageScroll.min.js

1617 ms

default_dynamic_callback.js

default_dynamic_callback.js

1419 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

1421 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1420 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

1509 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1509 ms

index.js

index.js

1509 ms

counter.js

counter.js

1328 ms

countTo.js

countTo.js

1429 ms

counter-part.min.js

counter-part.min.js

1427 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1538 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1532 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1323 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1312 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1408 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

1406 ms

logo-w-1.png

logo-w-1.png

614 ms

logo-black-1.png

logo-black-1.png

625 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

626 ms

Home-market.jpg

Home-market.jpg

1264 ms

cb-home-1-200x134.jpg

cb-home-1-200x134.jpg

723 ms

EMERITUS-LT-200x134.jpg

EMERITUS-LT-200x134.jpg

724 ms

ms-home-200x134.jpg

ms-home-200x134.jpg

836 ms

jl-home-200x134.jpg

jl-home-200x134.jpg

836 ms

CRUX-LT-200x134.jpg

CRUX-LT-200x134.jpg

864 ms

lt-home-200x134.jpg

lt-home-200x134.jpg

940 ms

er-home.jpg

er-home.jpg

940 ms

ms-home.jpg

ms-home.jpg

1042 ms

jl-home.jpg

jl-home.jpg

1046 ms

cbl-home.jpg

cbl-home.jpg

1055 ms

lt-home.jpg

lt-home.jpg

1150 ms

cb-home-1.jpg

cb-home-1.jpg

1158 ms

logo-w-300x109.png

logo-w-300x109.png

1262 ms

Leading-Technology-Group-Gradient.jpg

Leading-Technology-Group-Gradient.jpg

1403 ms

Leading-Technology-Group-Home.jpg

Leading-Technology-Group-Home.jpg

1622 ms

Home-market-bg-2.jpg

Home-market-bg-2.jpg

1505 ms

font

font

114 ms

font

font

216 ms

font

font

216 ms

font

font

217 ms

font

font

217 ms

font

font

405 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

1280 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

leadingtechnology.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

leadingtechnology.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

leadingtechnology.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leadingtechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leadingtechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

leadingtechnology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Leading Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: