3.7 sec in total
382 ms
3.1 sec
234 ms
Click here to check amazing LEDitLIGHT content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about leditlight.net
LEDitLIGHT.NET LED lampen 30 dagen op proef | 3 jaar garantie | gratis verzending | sinds 2006 de beste LED verlichting. Bekijk het ruime assortiment en bestel direct! Ook voor WAKAWAKALIGHT & WAKA WA...
Visit leditlight.netWe analyzed Leditlight.net page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
leditlight.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
382 ms
1130 ms
272 ms
185 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Leditlight.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Leditlight.net.
Page size can be reduced by 149.0 kB (16%)
918.1 kB
769.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Leditlight.net main page is 918.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 748.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LEDitLIGHT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leditlight.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (27%)
82
60
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LEDitLIGHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
leditlight.net
382 ms
www.leditlight.net
1130 ms
dhtmlxcommon.js
272 ms
dhtmlxslider.js
185 ms
dhtmlxslider_start.js
182 ms
dhtmlxslider2.css
185 ms
skin.css
319 ms
headertekst.js
407 ms
jquery.ezpz_tooltip.js
315 ms
conversion.js
16 ms
image_background3.jpg
99 ms
gloeilamp.png
197 ms
gloeilamp_hover.png
197 ms
led.png
196 ms
led_hover.png
196 ms
tl.png
98 ms
tl_hover.png
197 ms
tlsmall.png
198 ms
tlsmall_hover.png
272 ms
GloeilampKleineFitting.png
275 ms
GloeilampKleineFittingHover.png
275 ms
fiitingGroot.png
273 ms
fiitingGroot_hover.png
277 ms
G4.png
278 ms
G4Hover.png
363 ms
G9.png
366 ms
G9Hover.png
370 ms
GU10.png
368 ms
GU10Hover.png
373 ms
GU11.png
373 ms
GU11Hover.png
452 ms
MR16.png
454 ms
MR16Hover.png
456 ms
GU4.png
457 ms
GU4Hover.png
459 ms
GU5.3.png
461 ms
GU5.3Hover.png
543 ms
AR111.png
544 ms
AR111Hover.png
547 ms
lichtopbrengstL.png
549 ms
lichtopbrengstL_hover.png
551 ms
lichtopbrengstM.png
552 ms
lichtopbrengstM_hover.png
636 ms
lichtopbrengstH.png
634 ms
lichtopbrengstH_hover.png
635 ms
ga.js
14 ms
warm.png
727 ms
all.js
159 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
54 ms
warm_hover.png
545 ms
warmWit.png
546 ms
34 ms
56 ms
wit.png
533 ms
wit_hover.png
534 ms
dimmer.png
536 ms
dimmer_hover.png
538 ms
schakelaar.png
538 ms
137 ms
schakelaar_hover.png
618 ms
xd_arbiter.php
152 ms
xd_arbiter.php
275 ms
title_image.png
728 ms
i_asc_arrow.gif
549 ms
wakawakapower_iphone_1.jpg
547 ms
segula_s27ep_600_1.jpg
551 ms
starbucks_22s_ns_den_haag_ledsdoitnow_1280_1_1.jpg
549 ms
logo.jpg
903 ms
bkg_button_search_left.png
548 ms
bkg_button_chart_right.png
545 ms
devider_links.gif
545 ms
menuBack.png
546 ms
bg_main.png
630 ms
bg_1.png
631 ms
btn.png
553 ms
devider_products.gif
553 ms
bkg_button_detail_left.png
632 ms
bkg_button_detail_right.png
635 ms
bkg_button_chart_left.png
633 ms
winkelwagen.png
635 ms
map.png
553 ms
categorieImage.png
635 ms
enveloppe.png
635 ms
footerBack.png
636 ms
print.css
143 ms
leditlight.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
leditlight.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
leditlight.net SEO score
![]()
NL
![]()
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leditlight.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leditlight.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leditlight.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LEDitLIGHT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: