5.1 sec in total
356 ms
4.1 sec
689 ms
Welcome to lefac.com homepage info - get ready to check Lefac best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about lefac.com
Accédez au portail d'informations dédié aux métiers et acteurs de la communication: l’outil idéal pour développer votre activité commerciale
Visit lefac.comWe analyzed Lefac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lefac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
356 ms
510 ms
261 ms
352 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lefac.com, 83% (45 requests) were made to Andzup.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (863 ms) relates to the external source Andzup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 121.7 kB (12%)
986.7 kB
865.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lefac.com main page is 986.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lefac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 406 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lefac.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (49%)
47
24
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lefac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lefac.com
356 ms
510 ms
autoptimize_169f5e8d169f8e04d9f07ff23edb8c64.css
261 ms
dashicons.min.css
352 ms
autoptimize_single_7c748797fb10b6d0cdf20254e91f2c90.css
333 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
353 ms
autoptimize_single_1bc97d4fcd8664fc11e930aa197c6f53.css
337 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
338 ms
autoptimize_single_3c1eb5aec908ed2016804304c42106ae.css
347 ms
autoptimize_single_4dd9140126cd3a787c2b90c6e1763cdb.css
357 ms
jquery.min.js
435 ms
custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css
365 ms
autoptimize_single_3b731f0306e9aa6b320ef9e797fe9230.css
432 ms
autoptimize_single_c7727d9d478816b7101d1200e02b6422.css
431 ms
sha512.min.js
47 ms
micromodal.min.js
38 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
449 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
449 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
516 ms
hooks.min.js
517 ms
i18n.min.js
519 ms
autoptimize_17166ebd69d5e75572a9eb2444850db7.js
863 ms
micromodal.min.js
12 ms
micromodal.min.js
12 ms
www.andzup.com
855 ms
jquery.intlTelInput.min.js
88 ms
gtm.js
243 ms
ANDZUP-white-purple-1-optimized.png
178 ms
VILLE_COLOR-06.png
344 ms
FLECHE-IDEE-JAUNE.png
258 ms
Newsletterbonhomme-1-q27f9ux7dt49cwunbsyp7qncnjx2k0dxty528aq1sw-optimized.png
180 ms
Pitchlist-q27amfw243xph818xfqv3zjrox3jkrr1hb3p22ye1s-optimized.png
179 ms
Livre-BlancBonhomme-q27f96heg46sz1u5aieeewtd7j9izvox2l6fr3qaao-optimized.png
177 ms
blog-ampoule-q27anhhlphd6dmimtvzxvq27gby84nwayh7495en4w-optimized.png
259 ms
FLECHE-LOUPE-VIOLET.png
344 ms
YuriNeil-q25m3j6bhh945bkl8noe1da48lw0yxiu1cb60noaum-optimized.png
261 ms
SEEDTAG-q25kicnrqaz5vamp4xvfcsqnarq6psio6blt0oghda-optimized.png
262 ms
BERGAM-q25kicnrqaz5vamp4xvfcsqnarq6psio6blt0oghda-optimized.png
345 ms
XIX-SPORTS-q25kibpxjgxvjoo2afgssaz6pduti3exu6ybjehvji-optimized.png
347 ms
SERVICE-PLAN-q2g29g80v348yh6hy858c42k2zhzghzyjm29jsxrzi-optimized.png
347 ms
MEDIABRANDS-q2g29g80v348yh6hy858c42k2zhzghzyjm29jsxrzi-optimized.png
348 ms
m6PUB-q2g29fa6o92ymv7v3pqlrmb3hlmm8sw87hes2iz65q-optimized.png
430 ms
m6GROUPE-q2g29fa6o92ymv7v3pqlrmb3hlmm8sw87hes2iz65q-optimized.png
432 ms
GICOM-q2g29fa6o92ymv7v3pqlrmb3hlmm8sw87hes2iz65q-optimized.png
433 ms
WAZE-q2g29ecchf1ob99897bz74jmw7r913shvcral90kby-optimized.png
435 ms
playbac-q2hlyob6ki4arah9uhud1lnphq0379lnwjx919rs32-optimized.png
434 ms
FLECHE-CAPE_VIOLET-1-216x300-optimized.png
436 ms
FLECHE-SAUTE-VIOLET-160x300-optimized.png
519 ms
wARDj0u
3 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
519 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
541 ms
50531a68-2df2-4ea0-bdf5-9441c207a11d.js
547 ms
autoptimize_f8b91b0e60520b6787c8a6b117d6f2d2.css
115 ms
ppms.js
93 ms
lefac.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lefac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lefac.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lefac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lefac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lefac.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lefac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: