Tools & Wizards About Us
legaconsult.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

legaconsult.com

Bulgarian Law Firm

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

510 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

189 ms

legaconsult.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to legaconsult.com homepage info - get ready to check Legaconsult best content right away, or after learning these important things about legaconsult.com

Bulgarian Law Firm

Visit legaconsult.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Legaconsult.com page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

legaconsult.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.371

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

legaconsult.com

510 ms

legaconsult.com

1901 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

342 ms

style.min.css

611 ms

style.css

371 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Legaconsult.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Legaconsult.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 994.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

503.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Legaconsult.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 716.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 231.3 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Legaconsult images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 508.6 kB

  • Original 716.1 kB
  • After minification 716.0 kB
  • After compression 207.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 508.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 433.0 kB

  • Original 498.4 kB
  • After minification 488.4 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Legaconsult.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 433.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (84%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Legaconsult. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

legaconsult.com

legaconsult.com

510 ms

legaconsult.com

legaconsult.com

1901 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

342 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

611 ms

style.css

style.css

371 ms

style.css

style.css

372 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

382 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

383 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

466 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

494 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

496 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

890 ms

89df13995969b8f5ede45071c87c94f1.css

89df13995969b8f5ede45071c87c94f1.css

512 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

952 ms

global.css

global.css

618 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

620 ms

post-93.css

post-93.css

552 ms

post-152.css

post-152.css

642 ms

css

css

31 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

773 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

651 ms

global.js

global.js

561 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

645 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

657 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

690 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

796 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

911 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

797 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

953 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

970 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

877 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

941 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

941 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1000 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1067 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

1081 ms

%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8A%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD-%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82-200x300.jpg

%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8A%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD-%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82-200x300.jpg

757 ms

cropped-LegaConLogo21-1.png

cropped-LegaConLogo21-1.png

321 ms

Logo.jpg

Logo.jpg

324 ms

-%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%81-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0-scaled-e1585983350703.jpg

-%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%81-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0-scaled-e1585983350703.jpg

142 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

39 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

54 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

62 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

62 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

63 ms

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

61 ms

-%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%81-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0-scaled-e1585983350703.jpg

-%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%81-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0-scaled-e1585983350703.jpg

444 ms

Accessibility Review

legaconsult.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

legaconsult.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

legaconsult.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    BG

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Legaconsult.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Bulgarian language. Our system also found out that Legaconsult.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

legaconsult.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Legaconsult. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: