7.9 sec in total
276 ms
6.4 sec
1.2 sec
Visit lemaniqui.com now to see the best up-to-date Le Maniqui content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lemaniqui.com
Como Asesora de Imagen he ayudado a cientos de personas a conseguir una vida más feliz, más plena, más VIDA.
Visit lemaniqui.comWe analyzed Lemaniqui.com page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
lemaniqui.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,220 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.635
9/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
276 ms
3138 ms
47 ms
31 ms
464 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Lemaniqui.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lemaniqui.com.
Page size can be reduced by 512.7 kB (19%)
2.7 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lemaniqui.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 195.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 316.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Le Maniqui needs image optimization as it can save up to 316.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (79%)
91
19
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Le Maniqui. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lemaniqui.com
276 ms
lemaniqui.com
3138 ms
script.js
47 ms
jquery-ui.css
31 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.css
464 ms
tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css
570 ms
jquery.material.form.css
678 ms
intlTelInput.min.css
773 ms
reset.min.css
792 ms
style.css
785 ms
main.css
792 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
794 ms
style.min.css
831 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
878 ms
Defaults.css
897 ms
sassy-social-share-public.css
905 ms
js_composer.min.css
1133 ms
css
102 ms
main.min.css
1080 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
938 ms
wpbakery.min.css
986 ms
post-type.min.css
1022 ms
css-vars.css
1026 ms
custom.css
1164 ms
media.css
1117 ms
mega-menu.css
1159 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
1161 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
1189 ms
style.css
1237 ms
css
101 ms
style.min.css
1248 ms
headings.min.css
1247 ms
animate.min.css
1259 ms
info-box.min.css
1249 ms
jquery.min.js
1347 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1346 ms
rbtools.min.js
1551 ms
rs6.min.js
1586 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
1358 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
1368 ms
public.js
1505 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1460 ms
js
141 ms
js
228 ms
log
416 ms
css
20 ms
background-style.min.css
1009 ms
front_style.css
917 ms
font-awesome.min.css
924 ms
rs6.css
839 ms
animate.min.css
823 ms
reset-builder.css
829 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
925 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
924 ms
custom.min.js
886 ms
headings.min.js
845 ms
main.min.js
1181 ms
core.min.js
1166 ms
datepicker.min.js
1136 ms
cookie.js
1086 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.js
1049 ms
jquery.material.form.min.js
1046 ms
intlTelInput-jquery.min.js
982 ms
dialog_trigger.js
957 ms
ninjapopups.min.js
920 ms
app.js
916 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
899 ms
sassy-social-share-public.js
900 ms
legacy.min.js
890 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
842 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
833 ms
post-type.min.js
832 ms
info-box.min.js
834 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
980 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
900 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
903 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
887 ms
sbi-sprite.png
346 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
346 ms
the7-chevron-side.svg
422 ms
Diseno-sin-titulo-51.png
1009 ms
font
199 ms
font
200 ms
font
201 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
277 ms
le_maniqui_logo_header.png
211 ms
451292371_18446790547001691_1324856623507388056_nfull.webp
160 ms
454350198_18446598592001691_2016094983813986403_nfull.webp
229 ms
454169435_1686077175510564_7031830481823001554_nfull.jpg
237 ms
453771382_18446029543001691_4782309850480244491_nfull.jpg
156 ms
453861940_18445838302001691_7197957091819801161_nfull.jpg
271 ms
453895794_844932094245223_4223673302437515002_nfull.jpg
327 ms
le_maniqui_seccion_numeros_1_home.png
123 ms
home-.jpg
411 ms
451292371_18446790547001691_1324856623507388056_nfull.webp
284 ms
454350198_18446598592001691_2016094983813986403_nfull.webp
173 ms
lemaniqui.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lemaniqui.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lemaniqui.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lemaniqui.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lemaniqui.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lemaniqui.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Le Maniqui. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: