Tools & Wizards About Us
lenzinglife.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lenzinglife.com

Lenzing – Innovative by nature - Lenzing - innovative by nature

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

243 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

824 ms

lenzinglife.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lenzinglife.com homepage info - get ready to check Lenzing Life best content right away, or after learning these important things about lenzinglife.com

Welcome to the Lenzing Group! For 80 years now, we have been looking beyond fiber. With wood as our natural resource, we create exciting solutions for the needs of this world.

Visit lenzinglife.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lenzinglife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 243 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lenzinglife.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lenzinglife.com

243 ms

www.lenzing.com

533 ms

main.css

23 ms

ie-edge-fixes.css

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lenzinglife.com, 84% (37 requests) were made to Lenzing.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Lenzing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lenzinglife.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

  • Original 82.8 kB
  • After minification 82.3 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lenzing Life images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 40.5 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (21%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lenzing Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lenzinglife.com

lenzinglife.com

243 ms

www.lenzing.com

www.lenzing.com

533 ms

main.css

main.css

23 ms

ie-edge-fixes.css

ie-edge-fixes.css

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

308 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

124 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

89 ms

tencelTM.svg

tencelTM.svg

92 ms

ecovero-logo.svg

ecovero-logo.svg

93 ms

veocelTM_02.svg

veocelTM_02.svg

95 ms

lenzingTM.svg

lenzingTM.svg

144 ms

lenzing-startseite-header-annual-report-desktop.jpg

lenzing-startseite-header-annual-report-desktop.jpg

840 ms

lenzing-startseite-header-innovation.jpg

lenzing-startseite-header-innovation.jpg

835 ms

lenzing-startseite-header-herkunft.jpg

lenzing-startseite-header-herkunft.jpg

836 ms

circular-economy-slider-desktop.jpg

circular-economy-slider-desktop.jpg

943 ms

lenzing-startseite-header-zukunft.jpg

lenzing-startseite-header-zukunft.jpg

837 ms

segment-deko-desktop.fe1851c6.svg

segment-deko-desktop.fe1851c6.svg

429 ms

lenzing-marke-Tencel-E1.jpg

lenzing-marke-Tencel-E1.jpg

969 ms

lenzing-marke-tencel-content-E2.jpg

lenzing-marke-tencel-content-E2.jpg

1266 ms

lenzing-marke-veocel-content-E1.jpg

lenzing-marke-veocel-content-E1.jpg

1402 ms

lenzing-marke-veocel-content-E2.jpg

lenzing-marke-veocel-content-E2.jpg

848 ms

lineto-circular-pro-book.0ca8ee04.woff

lineto-circular-pro-book.0ca8ee04.woff

1375 ms

lineto-circular-pro-bold.64346b13.woff

lineto-circular-pro-bold.64346b13.woff

1397 ms

lenzing-marke-lenzing-content-lebensmittelkontakt2.jpg

lenzing-marke-lenzing-content-lebensmittelkontakt2.jpg

1681 ms

lenzing-marke-lenzing-content-lebensmittelkontakt.jpg

lenzing-marke-lenzing-content-lebensmittelkontakt.jpg

977 ms

lenzing-parallax-teaser-strategie.jpg

lenzing-parallax-teaser-strategie.jpg

1681 ms

lenzing-parallax-teaser-mission.jpg

lenzing-parallax-teaser-mission.jpg

2103 ms

lenzing-parallax-teaser-kreislauf.jpg

lenzing-parallax-teaser-kreislauf.jpg

1385 ms

Lenzing-Standorte-Weltkarte.png

Lenzing-Standorte-Weltkarte.png

1385 ms

sprite.svg

sprite.svg

1429 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

1353 ms

FormCrShield.js

FormCrShield.js

1379 ms

runtime.js

runtime.js

1379 ms

127.js

127.js

1380 ms

main.js

main.js

1379 ms

lenzing-bigteaser-karriere.jpg

lenzing-bigteaser-karriere.jpg

1642 ms

csm_lenzing-newsroom-teaser_EN_7874b8ec8d.jpg

csm_lenzing-newsroom-teaser_EN_7874b8ec8d.jpg

1815 ms

csm_lenzing-publikationen-smallteaser_74f95c3a08.jpg

csm_lenzing-publikationen-smallteaser_74f95c3a08.jpg

1889 ms

destination

destination

78 ms

masanascript-1propia-fixed.e4ba93ea.woff

masanascript-1propia-fixed.e4ba93ea.woff

1640 ms

54 ms

36 ms

39 ms

print.css

print.css

12 ms

Accessibility Review

lenzinglife.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lenzinglife.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lenzinglife.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lenzinglife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lenzinglife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lenzinglife.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lenzing Life. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: