Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

leoclean.fi

Siivousliike & yrityssiivous Helsinki - Leo Clean

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

leoclean.fi screenshot

About Website

Visit leoclean.fi now to see the best up-to-date Leo Clean content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leoclean.fi

Etsitkö parasta yrityssiivousta Helsinkiin? Siivousliike Leo Clean Oy tarjoaa siivouspalvelut yrityksille, liikekeskuksille, toimistoille, myymälöille yms.

Visit leoclean.fi

Key Findings

We analyzed Leoclean.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leoclean.fi performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,560 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

leoclean.fi

320 ms

leoclean.fi

540 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

99 ms

style.min.css

197 ms

styles.css

291 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Leoclean.fi, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) relates to the external source Service.giosg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 268.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Leoclean.fi main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 130.3 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 145.5 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 137.9 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leo Clean images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (58%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leo Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

leoclean.fi accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

leoclean.fi best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

leoclean.fi SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FI

  • Language Claimed

    FI

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leoclean.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leoclean.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Leo Clean. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: