5.6 sec in total
500 ms
4.6 sec
491 ms
Welcome to lexet.ru homepage info - get ready to check Lexet best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about lexet.ru
Розничные и оптовые продажи автозапчастей. Прямые поставки из Европы и Азии. Запчасти для иномарок по отличным ценам в Москве, Санкт-Петербурге и в других городах.
Visit lexet.ruWe analyzed Lexet.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lexet.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
500 ms
1078 ms
134 ms
254 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Lexet.ru, 4% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 2% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lexet.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.9 MB
640.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lexet.ru main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lexet needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 980.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 980.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lexet.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (47%)
88
47
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lexet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lexet.ru
500 ms
www.lexet.ru
1078 ms
main.css
134 ms
avto-via.css
254 ms
mavselect.css
258 ms
slide_menu.css
259 ms
style.css
260 ms
manager_page.css
266 ms
jquery.qtip.min.reg.css
267 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.css
379 ms
over-jquery-ui.css
381 ms
tinybox.css
384 ms
mootools.js
771 ms
mootools-more.js
1285 ms
lib.common.js
522 ms
jquery-1.11.min.js
877 ms
jquery.min.js
885 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
637 ms
cf.common.js
650 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.js
1660 ms
class.MavSelectBox.js
801 ms
slide_menu.js
897 ms
script.js
910 ms
cf.js
1002 ms
tinybox.js
1009 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.2.2.js
1024 ms
share.js
12 ms
bg_body.png
129 ms
bg_top_lines.png
137 ms
ar_office.png
138 ms
header_orders2.png
129 ms
custom_basket_bg.png
130 ms
logo.png
129 ms
bg_search.png
238 ms
search_example.png
240 ms
btn_search.png
242 ms
item_1.png
221 ms
item_2.png
224 ms
item_8.png
225 ms
item_4.png
338 ms
item_5.png
339 ms
mootools-more-old.js
342 ms
squeezebox.js
347 ms
audi.png
293 ms
bmw.png
293 ms
chevrolet.png
385 ms
11440151089.gif
386 ms
citroen.png
392 ms
daewoo.png
391 ms
ford.png
395 ms
honda.png
399 ms
infiniti.png
512 ms
jeep.png
513 ms
land_rover.png
515 ms
lexus.png
521 ms
mazda.png
520 ms
mercedes.png
525 ms
mini
639 ms
mitsubishi.png
640 ms
nissan.png
640 ms
opel.png
645 ms
peugeot.png
649 ms
renault.png
650 ms
seat.png
765 ms
skoda.png
763 ms
ssangyong.png
760 ms
subaru.png
762 ms
suzuki.png
768 ms
toyota.png
768 ms
volvo.png
769 ms
vw.png
773 ms
item_1.png
770 ms
item_2.png
765 ms
item_3.png
773 ms
left_menu_title.png
638 ms
auth_title.png
746 ms
input_grad.png
737 ms
bg_btn.png
738 ms
bg_footer_menu.png
729 ms
hit
266 ms
watch.js
181 ms
Kx2TzU8UtH
174 ms
squeezebox_info.css
729 ms
ajax-loader-big.gif
703 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
210 ms
watch.js
471 ms
hit
133 ms
advert.gif
91 ms
close_form.png
149 ms
angle_office.png
158 ms
b-share-icon.png
10 ms
1
92 ms
lexet.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lexet.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
lexet.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lexet.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lexet.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lexet.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lexet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: