1.4 sec in total
67 ms
858 ms
441 ms
Click here to check amazing Lfcarry content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lfcarry.com
Visit lfcarry.comWe analyzed Lfcarry.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
lfcarry.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value3,930 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.473
18/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
67 ms
76 ms
60 ms
33 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Lfcarry.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (447 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 22.1 kB (15%)
150.2 kB
128.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lfcarry.com main page is 150.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 98.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lfcarry images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 857 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)
45
16
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lfcarry. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lfcarry.com
67 ms
lfcarry.com
76 ms
gtm.js
60 ms
tooltips.js
33 ms
73c648d0f29c8e51.css
15 ms
ec5e275fd84eb309.css
23 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
129 ms
webpack-235955b20eb3ee85.js
40 ms
framework-2c79e2a64abdb08b.js
32 ms
main-e3c17793e9632a99.js
23 ms
_app-9d836d10ade9124f.js
39 ms
682-f00d0e11f25cd325.js
41 ms
index-843132987f379536.js
40 ms
_buildManifest.js
42 ms
_ssgManifest.js
45 ms
css2
53 ms
logo.755ceffe.svg
14 ms
USD.d93a4901.svg
17 ms
EUR.16269169.svg
18 ms
Games.082c7151.svg
19 ms
trustStar.5fe0e486.svg
20 ms
image
57 ms
image
125 ms
image
83 ms
footerLogo.a5a900cf.svg
55 ms
instagram.a2471e6c.svg
56 ms
facebook.a053d24a.svg
58 ms
twitter.2ebea29f.svg
59 ms
youtube.bcd6109f.svg
81 ms
js
54 ms
bat.js
238 ms
events.js
311 ms
b2va3tlj5k
310 ms
js
236 ms
js
308 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
309 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
373 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
447 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
445 ms
159 ms
295008304.js
75 ms
analytics.js
103 ms
clarity.js
34 ms
main.MTNhZGZiOTRkMQ.js
85 ms
295008304
118 ms
collect
21 ms
30 ms
collect
7 ms
collect
17 ms
ga-audiences
15 ms
c.gif
7 ms
lfcarry.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lfcarry.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lfcarry.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lfcarry.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lfcarry.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lfcarry.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lfcarry. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: