948 ms in total
44 ms
800 ms
104 ms
Click here to check amazing Lfoxcopy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lfoxcopy.com
From direct mail and print, to web and collateral, Leslie Fox brings a great deal of copywriting experience to the table, with happy clients to prove it.
Visit lfoxcopy.comWe analyzed Lfoxcopy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 904 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
lfoxcopy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value3,960 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
44 ms
48 ms
24 ms
29 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lfoxcopy.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (243 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 42.5 kB (6%)
700.9 kB
658.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lfoxcopy.com main page is 700.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 544.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lfoxcopy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lfoxcopy.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (84%)
55
9
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lfoxcopy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lfoxcopy.com
44 ms
lfoxcopy.com
48 ms
fluid_grid.css
24 ms
blog.css
29 ms
css
55 ms
global.css
37 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
styles.css
41 ms
foobox.min.css
42 ms
fonts.css
41 ms
sumoselect.min.css
45 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
55 ms
styles.min.css
58 ms
css
66 ms
style.css
67 ms
nimble-portfolio.css
71 ms
skin.css
66 ms
prettyphoto.css
69 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
73 ms
circle-progress.js
82 ms
global.js
88 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
89 ms
tocca.min.js
86 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
86 ms
jquery.fullscreen.min.js
100 ms
scripts.min.js
99 ms
foobox.min.js
101 ms
platform.js
35 ms
hooks.min.js
106 ms
i18n.min.js
105 ms
index.js
107 ms
index.js
122 ms
comment-reply.min.js
117 ms
navigation.js
130 ms
api.js
88 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
125 ms
index.js
119 ms
sort.js
126 ms
prettyphoto.js
140 ms
nimble-prettyPhoto.js
141 ms
genericons.css
85 ms
analytics.js
96 ms
recaptcha__en.js
198 ms
logo.jpg
139 ms
homepage.jpg
138 ms
pp_download.png
87 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
77 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
139 ms
fastbutton
134 ms
foobox.svg
91 ms
foobox.woff
67 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
119 ms
postmessageRelay
107 ms
js
146 ms
developers.google.com
243 ms
1380534674-postmessagerelay.js
18 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
lfoxcopy.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
lfoxcopy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lfoxcopy.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lfoxcopy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lfoxcopy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lfoxcopy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lfoxcopy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: