Tools & Wizards About Us
lgce.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

lgce.net

LGCE | FTTH Fibre Optic, Structured Cabling and Power Cabling Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

351 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

lgce.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lgce.net homepage info - get ready to check LGCE best content right away, or after learning these important things about lgce.net

LGCE has extensive experience as a supplier of passive FttX systems, structured cabling and power cable solutions.

Visit lgce.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lgce.net page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lgce.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lgce.net

351 ms

lgce.net

334 ms

www.lgce.net

535 ms

bootstrap.min.css

253 ms

font-awesome.css

326 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Lgce.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (834 ms) belongs to the original domain Lgce.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 682.9 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

523.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lgce.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 557.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 355.0 kB
  • After minification 342.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LGCE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 424.8 kB

  • Original 557.5 kB
  • After minification 451.7 kB
  • After compression 132.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 207.1 kB

  • Original 247.9 kB
  • After minification 211.2 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lgce.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (60%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LGCE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lgce.net

lgce.net

351 ms

lgce.net

lgce.net

334 ms

www.lgce.net

www.lgce.net

535 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

253 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

326 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

252 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

252 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

259 ms

vm-validation.css

vm-validation.css

260 ms

vm-global.css

vm-global.css

500 ms

vm-menus.css

vm-menus.css

336 ms

vm-mobile.css

vm-mobile.css

337 ms

clp.white.css

clp.white.css

338 ms

ekko-lightbox.css

ekko-lightbox.css

345 ms

map.css

map.css

405 ms

mapplic.css

mapplic.css

420 ms

i-map.css

i-map.css

420 ms

sjm5mzo.js

sjm5mzo.js

89 ms

js

js

62 ms

home.css

home.css

421 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

602 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

578 ms

velocity.js

velocity.js

576 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

577 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

575 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

582 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

670 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

672 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

589 ms

jquery.marquee.min.js

jquery.marquee.min.js

646 ms

vm-utils.js

vm-utils.js

666 ms

vm-form-manager.js

vm-form-manager.js

676 ms

vm-form-ajax.js

vm-form-ajax.js

688 ms

vm-form-validation.js

vm-form-validation.js

728 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

751 ms

vm-global.js

vm-global.js

753 ms

clp.js

clp.js

755 ms

ekko-lightbox.js

ekko-lightbox.js

759 ms

hammer.min.js

hammer.min.js

774 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

808 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

834 ms

mapplic.js

mapplic.js

597 ms

logo.png

logo.png

334 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

445 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

445 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

446 ms

uk.png

uk.png

446 ms

nl.png

nl.png

447 ms

d.png

d.png

447 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

446 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

614 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

491 ms

icon-f-1.png

icon-f-1.png

529 ms

icon-f-2.png

icon-f-2.png

529 ms

icon-f-3.png

icon-f-3.png

530 ms

icon-f-4.png

icon-f-4.png

465 ms

icon-f-5.png

icon-f-5.png

508 ms

logo-20.png

logo-20.png

518 ms

logo-21.png

logo-21.png

524 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

525 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

527 ms

logo-22.png

logo-22.png

576 ms

logo-23.png

logo-23.png

551 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

535 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

516 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

518 ms

logo-4.png

logo-4.png

535 ms

logo-5.png

logo-5.png

570 ms

logo-6.png

logo-6.png

573 ms

logo-7.png

logo-7.png

538 ms

logo-8.png

logo-8.png

513 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

195 ms

d

d

48 ms

d

d

51 ms

d

d

52 ms

d

d

52 ms

d

d

85 ms

case-studies

case-studies

300 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

303 ms

p.gif

p.gif

27 ms

reset.png

reset.png

86 ms

plus.png

plus.png

86 ms

minus.png

minus.png

83 ms

openhand.cur

openhand.cur

87 ms

Accessibility Review

lgce.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

lgce.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lgce.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lgce.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lgce.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lgce.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LGCE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: