Access lianceandsmith.com. Liance & Smith | Communication & Design team

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

1347 ms

js

152 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

287 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

206 ms

style.min.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (110 requests) were addressed to the original Lianceandsmith.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lianceandsmith.com.

Content Size

11.3 MB

After Optimization

11.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Lianceandsmith.com main page is 11.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 195.1 kB

Original 226.1 kB
After minification 222.0 kB
After compression 31.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 82.2 kB

Original 10.7 MB
After minification 10.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liance And Smith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

Original 219.6 kB
After minification 219.4 kB
After compression 205.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

Original 175.5 kB
After minification 174.6 kB
After compression 171.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lianceandsmith.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

117

After Optimization

The browser has sent 117 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liance And Smith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lianceandsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lianceandsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lianceandsmith.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Liance And Smith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Liance & Smith | Communication & Design team | Bordeaux

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram