4.4 sec in total
535 ms
3.3 sec
544 ms
Welcome to libel.fr homepage info - get ready to check Libel best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about libel.fr
Libel éditeur de logiciels depuis plus de 20 ans : solution Appel d'offres, formation - Logiciel maitrise d'oeuvre - Logiciel intervention
Visit libel.frWe analyzed Libel.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 535 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
libel.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.2
62/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
535 ms
96 ms
192 ms
349 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Libel.fr, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (853 ms) belongs to the original domain Libel.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 206.8 kB (8%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Libel.fr main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Libel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Libel.fr has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (76%)
91
22
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Libel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.libel.fr
535 ms
prettyPhoto.css
96 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
192 ms
style.min.css
349 ms
styles.css
263 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
269 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
270 ms
styles.css
273 ms
style.css
286 ms
dittyDisplays.css
352 ms
all.css
448 ms
modal-min.css
359 ms
rs6.css
365 ms
rss-news-display.css
380 ms
slick.css
431 ms
recent-post-style.css
435 ms
all.css
56 ms
js_composer.min.css
632 ms
addtoany.min.css
454 ms
style.css
473 ms
swiper.min.css
515 ms
Defaults.css
521 ms
style.min.css
534 ms
styles.css
648 ms
style.css
567 ms
style.css
595 ms
css
71 ms
css
88 ms
v4-shims.css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
691 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
617 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
670 ms
video-lightbox.js
679 ms
page.js
73 ms
addtoany.min.js
707 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
714 ms
rbtools.min.js
733 ms
rs6.min.js
853 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
764 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
776 ms
modernizr.custom.js
798 ms
css2
92 ms
js
124 ms
css
89 ms
l.js
69 ms
api.js
86 ms
feedzy-rss-feeds.css
799 ms
background-style.min.css
741 ms
index.js
674 ms
index.js
768 ms
swiped-events.min.js
763 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
759 ms
effect.min.js
759 ms
ditty-news-ticker.js
753 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
690 ms
scripts.js
688 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
680 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
671 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
659 ms
index.js
715 ms
foundation.min.js
708 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
692 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
691 ms
select2.min.js
670 ms
scripts.min.js
625 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
724 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
711 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
679 ms
custom.min.js
647 ms
eso.D0Uc7kY6.js
22 ms
sa.js
437 ms
www.libel.fr
320 ms
newlogo.png
319 ms
jungle.jpg
628 ms
explorateur.png
696 ms
fond-papiers.jpg
572 ms
fond-ville.jpg
425 ms
super-climaticien2-1.png
575 ms
libellule.png
426 ms
team-2024.png
747 ms
architecte.jpg
573 ms
entreprises-btp.jpg
574 ms
thermicien.jpg
625 ms
services-fournitures.jpg
696 ms
pad-screen.png
739 ms
packshot-libel-appels-offres.png
698 ms
packshot-libel-maitrise-oeuvre.png
630 ms
packshot-libel-intervention-gestion.png
629 ms
font
107 ms
font
108 ms
font
108 ms
feedzy.svg
531 ms
font
108 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
21 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
560 ms
recaptcha__en.js
180 ms
1.png
96 ms
libel.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
libel.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
libel.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Libel.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Libel.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
libel.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Libel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: