Tools & Wizards About Us
lidsbydesign.beauty screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lidsbydesign.beauty

Contours Rx | Lift, Treat, and Renew to a More Youthful Appearance

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

246 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

lidsbydesign.beauty screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lidsbydesign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lidsbydesign.beauty

LIDS BY DESIGN is the perfect solution to a common problem people face everyday- hooded, droopy and tired eyes.

Visit lidsbydesign.beauty

Key Findings

We analyzed Lidsbydesign.beauty page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lidsbydesign.beauty performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,700 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.611

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lidsbydesign.beauty

246 ms

css2

33 ms

slick.css

23 ms

style.min.css

242 ms

js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Lidsbydesign.beauty, 21% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 11% (7 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lidsbydesign.beauty.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lidsbydesign.beauty main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 201.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lidsbydesign needs image optimization as it can save up to 201.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 389.4 kB
  • After minification 389.4 kB
  • After compression 365.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lidsbydesign.beauty has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (50%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lidsbydesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lidsbydesign.beauty

lidsbydesign.beauty

246 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

slick.css

slick.css

23 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

242 ms

js

js

65 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

355 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

23 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

51 ms

epbuwz3hsk

epbuwz3hsk

70 ms

lids-by-design-logo.png

lids-by-design-logo.png

266 ms

lids-by-design-1-sm.png

lids-by-design-1-sm.png

577 ms

check.png

check.png

268 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

79 ms

lids-by-design-1.png

lids-by-design-1.png

630 ms

lids-by-design-1-md.png

lids-by-design-1-md.png

471 ms

lids-by-design-2.jpg

lids-by-design-2.jpg

259 ms

lids-by-design-2-md.jpg

lids-by-design-2-md.jpg

268 ms

lids-by-design-3.jpg

lids-by-design-3.jpg

611 ms

lids-by-design-4.jpg

lids-by-design-4.jpg

786 ms

lids-by-design-5.jpg

lids-by-design-5.jpg

279 ms

lids-by-design-6.jpg

lids-by-design-6.jpg

662 ms

lids-by-design-7.png

lids-by-design-7.png

689 ms

lids-by-design-8.png

lids-by-design-8.png

814 ms

lids-by-design-9.png

lids-by-design-9.png

815 ms

check_2.png

check_2.png

847 ms

lids-by-design-7.jpg

lids-by-design-7.jpg

938 ms

user1.png

user1.png

1133 ms

stars.png

stars.png

1047 ms

user2.png

user2.png

1280 ms

user3.png

user3.png

824 ms

user4.png

user4.png

1244 ms

lids-by-design-10.png

lids-by-design-10.png

1449 ms

dmca.png

dmca.png

946 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

87 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

155 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

169 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

169 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

170 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

168 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

62 ms

swatch

swatch

60 ms

1f3dkm0m7

1f3dkm0m7

288 ms

angle-left.png

angle-left.png

876 ms

angle-right.png

angle-right.png

885 ms

insideIframe.js

insideIframe.js

11 ms

flashPlayer.js

flashPlayer.js

42 ms

share-v2.js

share-v2.js

6 ms

mput

mput

69 ms

allIntegrations.js

allIntegrations.js

7 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

171 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

64 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

58 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

66 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

56 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

181 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

105 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

148 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

197 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

210 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

160 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

209 ms

Accessibility Review

lidsbydesign.beauty accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lidsbydesign.beauty best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lidsbydesign.beauty SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lidsbydesign.beauty can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lidsbydesign.beauty main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lidsbydesign.beauty

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lidsbydesign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: