4 sec in total
703 ms
2.5 sec
782 ms
Visit lifearticles.net now to see the best up-to-date Lifearticles content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifearticles.net
Visit lifearticles.netWe analyzed Lifearticles.net page load time and found that the first response time was 703 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lifearticles.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
703 ms
141 ms
192 ms
346 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Lifearticles.net, 19% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 16% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifearticles.net.
Page size can be reduced by 211.3 kB (64%)
332.6 kB
121.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifearticles.net main page is 332.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifearticles images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifearticles.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)
30
14
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifearticles. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifearticles.net
703 ms
style.css
141 ms
gdsr.css.php
192 ms
jquery.js
346 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
152 ms
gdsr.js
174 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
wp-embed.min.js
77 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
143 ms
top.gif
479 ms
bubble_right.gif
479 ms
bubble_left.gif
479 ms
css.php
478 ms
ca-pub-9011234331211977.js
461 ms
zrt_lookup.html
507 ms
show_ads_impl.js
465 ms
stars24.png
462 ms
ads
335 ms
osd.js
13 ms
ads
286 ms
ads
247 ms
5642384801146649118
157 ms
abg.js
64 ms
m_js_controller.js
80 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
165 ms
10449724064427061848
58 ms
s
82 ms
redir.html
149 ms
x_button_blue2.png
82 ms
favicon
142 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
7 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
11 ms
lifearticles.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
lifearticles.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
lifearticles.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifearticles.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifearticles.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifearticles.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifearticles. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: