Tools & Wizards About Us
lifebogger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

lifebogger.com

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

619 ms

lifebogger.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifebogger content for Nigeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifebogger.com

Every Footballer, Manager and Elite have got Childhood Stories. LifeBogger welcomes you to its home of Football Childhood Stories & Biography

Visit lifebogger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifebogger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifebogger.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,170 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.313

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifebogger.com

94 ms

lifebogger.com

42 ms

js

82 ms

css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

376 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Lifebogger.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifebogger.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 322.9 kB (56%)

Content Size

573.7 kB

After Optimization

250.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lifebogger.com main page is 573.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 367.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 322.8 kB

  • Original 367.9 kB
  • After minification 346.1 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 322.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 183.9 kB
  • After minification 183.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifebogger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 68 B

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (83%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifebogger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifebogger.com

lifebogger.com

94 ms

lifebogger.com

lifebogger.com

42 ms

js

js

82 ms

css

css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

376 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

273 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

273 ms

main.js

main.js

277 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

278 ms

lifebogger.js

lifebogger.js

56 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

273 ms

form.min.js

form.min.js

328 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

330 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

331 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

333 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

337 ms

jquery.material.form.min.js

jquery.material.form.min.js

436 ms

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

438 ms

dialog_trigger.js

dialog_trigger.js

437 ms

ninjapopups.min.js

ninjapopups.min.js

438 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

438 ms

index.js

index.js

439 ms

index.js

index.js

455 ms

wpdiscuz-combo.min.js

wpdiscuz-combo.min.js

713 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

460 ms

js_posts_autoload.min.js

js_posts_autoload.min.js

461 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

727 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

507 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

531 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

532 ms

image.js

image.js

533 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

20 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

32 ms

LifeBogger-Logo.png

LifeBogger-Logo.png

159 ms

LifeBogger-Mobile-View.png

LifeBogger-Mobile-View.png

176 ms

gtranslate-style24.css

gtranslate-style24.css

174 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

162 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

198 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css

221 ms

jquery.material.form.css

jquery.material.form.css

232 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

234 ms

reset.min.css

reset.min.css

264 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

296 ms

theme8.css

theme8.css

345 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

347 ms

main.css

main.css

354 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

355 ms

styles.css

styles.css

358 ms

video-container.min.css

video-container.min.css

360 ms

style.css

style.css

557 ms

fa.min.css

fa.min.css

414 ms

wpdiscuz-combo.min.css

wpdiscuz-combo.min.css

416 ms

style.css

style.css

421 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

425 ms

style.css

style.css

570 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

563 ms

td_legacy_main.css

td_legacy_main.css

581 ms

td_standard_pack_main.css

td_standard_pack_main.css

825 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

60 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

61 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

63 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

42 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

498 ms

elements.png

elements.png

83 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

127 ms

lHEwbEH.jpg

lHEwbEH.jpg

76 ms

WKUN4xa.jpg

WKUN4xa.jpg

54 ms

Accessibility Review

lifebogger.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lifebogger.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lifebogger.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifebogger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifebogger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifebogger.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifebogger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: