Tools & Wizards About Us
lifecall.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

lifecall.org

Lifecall - Pregnant and need help? We can help you.

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

lifecall.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifecall content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifecall.org

Are you pregnant and need help? Lifecall has been providing help, comfort, and information to pregnant teens and unwed mothers for over 20 years.

Visit lifecall.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifecall.org page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifecall.org performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,460 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.183

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifecall.org

147 ms

reset.css

64 ms

main1.css

81 ms

nav.css

81 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Lifecall.org, 11% (3 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.2 kB (8%)

Content Size

284.8 kB

After Optimization

260.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifecall.org main page is 284.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 183.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 183.4 kB
  • After minification 177.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifecall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifecall.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (25%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifecall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifecall.org

lifecall.org

147 ms

reset.css

reset.css

64 ms

main1.css

main1.css

81 ms

nav.css

nav.css

81 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

104 ms

images.js

images.js

81 ms

p7TTM06.css

p7TTM06.css

76 ms

p7TTMscripts.js

p7TTMscripts.js

140 ms

p7PMMscripts.js

p7PMMscripts.js

142 ms

p7PMMh07.css

p7PMMh07.css

195 ms

ga.js

ga.js

171 ms

flower1.png

flower1.png

162 ms

facebook_32.png

facebook_32.png

119 ms

twitter_32.png

twitter_32.png

114 ms

133853112

133853112

419 ms

pmm_sheer_root.png

pmm_sheer_root.png

57 ms

shelter-image.jpg

shelter-image.jpg

79 ms

shelter2-image-rollover.jpg

shelter2-image-rollover.jpg

51 ms

front-page-babies300.jpg

front-page-babies300.jpg

93 ms

flower2.png

flower2.png

92 ms

facebook_16.png

facebook_16.png

91 ms

twitter_16.png

twitter_16.png

91 ms

contact-button.png

contact-button.png

102 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

527080927-f5cc65d92571b72f02087692a5c0eb3795e513ee5de9989a6f7289ce72bc9946-d.jpg

527080927-f5cc65d92571b72f02087692a5c0eb3795e513ee5de9989a6f7289ce72bc9946-d.jpg

27 ms

player.js

player.js

200 ms

player.css

player.css

149 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

200 ms

Accessibility Review

lifecall.org accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lifecall.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lifecall.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifecall.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifecall.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifecall.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifecall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: