Tools & Wizards About Us
lifehover.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lifehover.com

Page Load Speed

20 sec in total

First Response

842 ms

Resources Loaded

19.1 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

lifehover.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifehover.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifehover content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifehover.com

Visit lifehover.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifehover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 842 ms and then it took 19.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifehover.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medulance.com

842 ms

css2

48 ms

js

105 ms

js

71 ms

js

125 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lifehover.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (4 requests) were made to Staticpg.paytmpayments.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.1 sec) relates to the external source Staticpg.paytmpayments.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 400.1 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

941.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifehover.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 241.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 871.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 153.7 kB

  • Original 221.2 kB
  • After minification 221.0 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifehover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifehover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

medulance.com

medulance.com

842 ms

css2

css2

48 ms

js

js

105 ms

js

js

71 ms

js

js

125 ms

runtime.8be0ef19dce37843.js

runtime.8be0ef19dce37843.js

191 ms

polyfills.8e328bcf3d9f2132.js

polyfills.8e328bcf3d9f2132.js

382 ms

scripts.49a505a731e33646.js

scripts.49a505a731e33646.js

1311 ms

main.628fff5d5e7aed91.js

main.628fff5d5e7aed91.js

1320 ms

eutopi71022131326381.js

eutopi71022131326381.js

595 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

41 ms

launcher-v2.js

launcher-v2.js

45 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

23 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

43 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

26 ms

client:plusone.js

client:plusone.js

43 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

8 ms

eutopi71022131326381

eutopi71022131326381

375 ms

paytm.style.css

paytm.style.css

93 ms

paytm.checkout.js

paytm.checkout.js

119 ms

styles.ff4e664723df57e2.css

styles.ff4e664723df57e2.css

387 ms

ui-logger-v18.min.js

ui-logger-v18.min.js

12 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

7943 ms

eutopi71022131326381

eutopi71022131326381

279 ms

dummy-frame.html

dummy-frame.html

244 ms

promise-polyfill.min.js

promise-polyfill.min.js

16092 ms

Accessibility Review

lifehover.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifehover.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifehover.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifehover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifehover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifehover.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifehover. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: