4.2 sec in total
283 ms
3.6 sec
300 ms
Click here to check amazing Life Leisure content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifeleisure.net
Life Leisure run an extensive mix of sports and leisure facilities in Stockport. If you would like more information on this, contact us today!
Visit lifeleisure.netWe analyzed Lifeleisure.net page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lifeleisure.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value240 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
283 ms
509 ms
179 ms
186 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeleisure.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeleisure.net.
Page size can be reduced by 489.7 kB (37%)
1.3 MB
844.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeleisure.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 878.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Life Leisure needs image optimization as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 240.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeleisure.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (41%)
69
41
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Leisure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeleisure.net
283 ms
www.lifeleisure.net
509 ms
global.min.css
179 ms
BaseCss.css
186 ms
Jtip.css
190 ms
LayoutCss.css
205 ms
jquery.datepick.css
197 ms
TextCss.css
193 ms
AdminButtons.css
272 ms
jquery.multiSelect.css
281 ms
Thickbox.css
311 ms
CSCCss.css
321 ms
MacroCss.css
307 ms
jquery.min.js
479 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
367 ms
MicrosoftAjax.js
549 ms
MicrosoftMvcAjax.js
408 ms
jquery.collapsor.js
412 ms
Thickbox.js
423 ms
Resizer.js
465 ms
CMSSearch.js
510 ms
jtip.js
517 ms
paRSS.js
522 ms
PopLink.js
565 ms
testautomation.js
605 ms
Landing.js
1135 ms
CMSCommon.js
633 ms
EmailIcon.jpg
88 ms
205c2d68-8df6-408c-9408-37a0b4d5c4cf
96 ms
e88068f9-6726-4a15-981b-2721f44af517
93 ms
7290dd50-3543-4350-b554-d740da42ba8b
96 ms
1165cf99-d5a9-4137-b379-43156e0e43d5
571 ms
e596dd6e-3107-4330-bc42-fa4e61e9f6fa
201 ms
a63c6b26-fddf-4a72-a9b6-e92f230bcb98
171 ms
b4e7b1e2-8ca3-4697-a978-4d80c05e2747
181 ms
56c81816-ea25-4d3c-96e6-34033a6c60d4
277 ms
50ec8cc2-578b-43a9-bffe-205e5184a0fe
269 ms
fd4a817a-bc08-41cf-9e04-8a824dbe9c35
260 ms
ccef206b-d068-49e0-b0b7-95bcf045cbd5
271 ms
bacfcd43-3da2-4580-a8bd-dc890911aca9
301 ms
2a108dc2-042d-4b50-9659-0cda9de2cda3
347 ms
d7694619-bba8-47c2-bff8-c53b4f3a9ee5
359 ms
38a83f0d-e7c9-4f63-ace6-0c6ba7bf0855
359 ms
8d28b4b0-5d96-49c0-a237-9e94c63d0ef8
461 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
lifeleisurelogo.jpg
391 ms
topmenutile.gif
430 ms
TopNavTile.jpg
445 ms
CrumbsTile.jpg
440 ms
ButtonRed.jpg
474 ms
Header_FacilitySearch.jpg
508 ms
collect
13 ms
ListItem.jpg
499 ms
05b3f163-b5a4-4474-a2bd-b9a00d7bfec4
501 ms
CTA_CustomBlue.jpg
516 ms
ButtonBlue.jpg
540 ms
CTA_CustomRed.jpg
566 ms
CTA_CustomBlack.jpg
583 ms
ButtonBlack.jpg
583 ms
footertop.jpg
604 ms
sdk.js
156 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
ga.js
6 ms
AlertDialog
629 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
602 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
133 ms
52 ms
xd_arbiter.php
152 ms
xd_arbiter.php
257 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
46 ms
jot
90 ms
lifeleisure.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
lifeleisure.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifeleisure.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeleisure.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeleisure.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeleisure.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Leisure. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: