7.7 sec in total
2.9 sec
4.4 sec
434 ms
Click here to check amazing Lifelida content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifelida.com
UFABET 999 สมัคร เว็บแทงบอลออนไลน์ ยูฟ่าเบท ที่ได้มาตรฐานระดับโลก เว็บ UFABET มือถือ ที่ดีที่สุดในประเทศไทย แทงบอลออนไลน์ คาสิโน บาคาร่า สล๊อต.
Visit lifelida.comWe analyzed Lifelida.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lifelida.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
2876 ms
725 ms
709 ms
489 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelida.com, 26% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifelida.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.9 kB (11%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifelida.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifelida images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifelida.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)
21
7
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifelida. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifelida.com
2876 ms
style.min.css
725 ms
style.css
709 ms
font-awesome.min.css
489 ms
css
25 ms
font-style5.css
486 ms
jquery.min.js
752 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
726 ms
html5.js
736 ms
119-600x400.jpeg
1383 ms
118-600x400.jpeg
1205 ms
117-600x400.webp
1209 ms
116-600x400.png
2183 ms
01-1-600x400.jpeg
1470 ms
01.webp
1492 ms
01.png
2628 ms
01-600x400.jpeg
1686 ms
52-600x400.jpeg
1619 ms
51-600x400.jpeg
1716 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
8 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
15 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
35 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
34 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf
34 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
34 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfox9897g.ttf
34 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf
35 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
729 ms
menu-dropdown.js
242 ms
myscripts.js
248 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
242 ms
lifelida.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
lifelida.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifelida.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelida.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifelida.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifelida.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifelida. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: