Tools & Wizards About Us
lifelock.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lifelock.org

Trusted Reviews & Ratings of Security Providers | AllSecurityReviews.com

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

472 ms

Page Rendered

633 ms

lifelock.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifelock content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifelock.org

Find expert reviews and real customer testimonials on every home security system provider. Each company graded across each aspect of their security system.

Visit lifelock.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifelock.org page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifelock.org performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifelock.org

43 ms

lifelock.org

71 ms

www.allsecurityreviews.com

117 ms

js

60 ms

bg-tile-id-theft.jpg

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelock.org, 70% (7 requests) were made to Allsecurityreviews.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) relates to the external source Allsecurityreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Lifelock.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 65.1 kB
  • After minification 65.1 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifelock images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifelock. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

lifelock.org

lifelock.org

43 ms

lifelock.org

lifelock.org

71 ms

www.allsecurityreviews.com

www.allsecurityreviews.com

117 ms

js

js

60 ms

bg-tile-id-theft.jpg

bg-tile-id-theft.jpg

190 ms

bg-tile-antivirus.jpg

bg-tile-antivirus.jpg

96 ms

bg-tile-vpn.jpg

bg-tile-vpn.jpg

157 ms

bg-man-on-laptop.jpg

bg-man-on-laptop.jpg

16 ms

sharenting.jpg

sharenting.jpg

16 ms

risks-of-smart-security.jpg

risks-of-smart-security.jpg

17 ms

Accessibility Review

lifelock.org accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lifelock.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

lifelock.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelock.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifelock.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifelock.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifelock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: