Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lifepower.be

LIFEPOWR - FlexiO | De slimme sturing voor jouw thuisbatterij | Antwerpen

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

406 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

740 ms

lifepower.be screenshot

About Website

Visit lifepower.be now to see the best up-to-date Lifepower content for Belgium and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifepower.be

Door je thuisbatterij en laadpaal slim aan te sturen, verlaag je je energiefactuur en draag je maximaal bij aan de energietransitie. FlexiO van Lifepowr helpt je hierbij, het is de slimste keuze voor ...

Visit lifepower.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifepower.be page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifepower.be performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value59,050 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value74.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifepower.be

406 ms

www.lifepowr.io

2502 ms

minified.js

49 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

183 ms

polyfill.min.js

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lifepower.be, 35% (11 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (9 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Lifepowr.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 678.0 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifepower.be main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 963.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 673.1 kB

  • Original 814.4 kB
  • After minification 811.1 kB
  • After compression 141.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 673.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 963.6 kB
  • After minification 958.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifepower images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (63%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifepower. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifepower.be accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

lifepower.be best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lifepower.be SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifepower.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifepower.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifepower. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: