Tools & Wizards About Us
lifesafetyservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

lifesafetyservice.com

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

lifesafetyservice.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifesafetyservice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifesafetyservice.com

As an independent service organization serving CT, MA, RI, and Eastern NY, we are specialists with a single focus: emergency lighting/egress life safety and fire extinguisher service—all for the safet...

Visit lifesafetyservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifesafetyservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifesafetyservice.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifesafetyservice.com

80 ms

lifesafetyservice.com

154 ms

style.css

79 ms

fonts.css

137 ms

css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesafetyservice.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifesafetyservice.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifesafetyservice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 104.1 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 101.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesafetyservice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (40%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifesafetyservice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifesafetyservice.com

lifesafetyservice.com

80 ms

lifesafetyservice.com

lifesafetyservice.com

154 ms

style.css

style.css

79 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

137 ms

css

css

58 ms

css

css

75 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.css

jquery.prettyPhoto.css

140 ms

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.css

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.css

124 ms

modernizr.custom.all.js

modernizr.custom.all.js

41 ms

respond.js

respond.js

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

57 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

50 ms

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.plugin.min.js

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.plugin.min.js

38 ms

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.min.js

jquery.cmsmsRevolutionSlider.min.js

49 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

44 ms

jquery.script.js

jquery.script.js

88 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

48 ms

jquery.validationEngine-lang.js

jquery.validationEngine-lang.js

113 ms

jquery.jtweetsanywhere.js

jquery.jtweetsanywhere.js

96 ms

body_bg.png

body_bg.png

94 ms

arrow_top.png

arrow_top.png

91 ms

social_bg.jpg

social_bg.jpg

91 ms

list_image.png

list_image.png

92 ms

emergency.png

emergency.png

90 ms

fire.png

fire.png

84 ms

def.png

def.png

84 ms

codes.png

codes.png

85 ms

social_toggle.png

social_toggle.png

91 ms

logo.png

logo.png

95 ms

nav_drop_a_bg.png

nav_drop_a_bg.png

92 ms

divider.png

divider.png

91 ms

but_grad_medium_bg.png

but_grad_medium_bg.png

93 ms

slide-truck.jpg

slide-truck.jpg

98 ms

slide-fire.jpg

slide-fire.jpg

100 ms

slide-codes.jpg

slide-codes.jpg

86 ms

slide-exit.jpg

slide-exit.jpg

92 ms

timer.png

timer.png

83 ms

briefcase.png

briefcase.png

86 ms

clock.png

clock.png

90 ms

earth.png

earth.png

96 ms

float.png

float.png

96 ms

regions-only-left.jpg

regions-only-left.jpg

95 ms

regions-only-right.jpg

regions-only-right.jpg

98 ms

post_type_nav.png

post_type_nav.png

96 ms

client-uconn.jpg

client-uconn.jpg

94 ms

client-hocc.jpg

client-hocc.jpg

105 ms

client-espn.jpg

client-espn.jpg

118 ms

client-wesleyan.jpg

client-wesleyan.jpg

98 ms

client-anthem.jpg

client-anthem.jpg

95 ms

client-bristol.jpg

client-bristol.jpg

96 ms

client-greenwich.jpg

client-greenwich.jpg

105 ms

client-yale.jpg

client-yale.jpg

99 ms

Facebook-icon.png

Facebook-icon.png

100 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

426 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

434 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

433 ms

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

420 ms

loader_for_white.gif

loader_for_white.gif

381 ms

bot_list_bg.png

bot_list_bg.png

380 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

482 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

57 ms

arrow_bullet.png

arrow_bullet.png

54 ms

Accessibility Review

lifesafetyservice.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifesafetyservice.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lifesafetyservice.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesafetyservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifesafetyservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifesafetyservice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifesafetyservice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: