2.6 sec in total
170 ms
1.5 sec
912 ms
Visit lifesaglitch.com now to see the best up-to-date Life S A Glitch content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifesaglitch.com
Visit lifesaglitch.comWe analyzed Lifesaglitch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lifesaglitch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value780 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.913
3/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
170 ms
181 ms
76 ms
135 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesaglitch.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (683 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifesaglitch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 894.2 kB (51%)
1.7 MB
846.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifesaglitch.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 975.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Life S A Glitch needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 689.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 689.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesaglitch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)
52
18
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life S A Glitch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifesaglitch.com
170 ms
www.lifesaglitch.com
181 ms
contact-form.css
76 ms
owl.carousel.css
135 ms
animate.css
141 ms
grid.css
135 ms
style.css
137 ms
jquery.js
210 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
154 ms
script.js
206 ms
font-awesome.min.css
8 ms
css
36 ms
gallery-loader-list.gif
241 ms
tlogo.png
171 ms
page4_img1.jpg
173 ms
page4_img2.jpg
170 ms
page4_img3.jpg
216 ms
page4_img4.jpg
216 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
embed
220 ms
parallax-1.jpg
540 ms
parallax-2.jpg
541 ms
parallax-3.jpg
683 ms
parallax-4.jpg
524 ms
form-loader.gif
229 ms
device.min.js
238 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
247 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
261 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
429 ms
smoothing-scroll.js
428 ms
jquery.stellar.js
437 ms
tmStickUp.js
430 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
430 ms
jquery.vide.js
432 ms
wow.min.js
580 ms
TweenLite.js
583 ms
scrollShowTime.js
582 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
582 ms
TMForm.js
589 ms
modal.js
603 ms
jquery.equalheights.js
605 ms
collect
55 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
8 ms
0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
52 ms
MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
7 ms
js
52 ms
init_embed.js
40 ms
common.js
157 ms
map.js
157 ms
google4.png
53 ms
overlay.js
48 ms
util.js
44 ms
onion.js
44 ms
search_impl.js
44 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
310 ms
stats.js
120 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
208 ms
lifesaglitch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifesaglitch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifesaglitch.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesaglitch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifesaglitch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifesaglitch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life S A Glitch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: