Tools & Wizards About Us
lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review: Business and Technology Magazine

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Life Sciences Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the neutral platform of business and technology news, expert viewpoints, challenges faced by the life sciences industry, and approach...

Visit lifesciencesreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifesciencesreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifesciencesreview.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,340 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.246

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifesciencesreview.com

142 ms

lifesciencesreview.com

256 ms

www.lifesciencesreview.com

639 ms

js

69 ms

css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesciencesreview.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifesciencesreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (35%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifesciencesreview.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 154.1 kB
  • After minification 152.5 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 658.7 kB
  • After minification 656.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Sciences Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 829.3 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 977.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 829.3 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 74.1 kB

  • Original 366.8 kB
  • After minification 356.6 kB
  • After compression 292.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesciencesreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (54%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Sciences Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifesciencesreview.com

lifesciencesreview.com

142 ms

lifesciencesreview.com

lifesciencesreview.com

256 ms

www.lifesciencesreview.com

www.lifesciencesreview.com

639 ms

js

js

69 ms

css

css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

164 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

289 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

227 ms

animate.css

animate.css

236 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

238 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

232 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

233 ms

style1.css

style1.css

299 ms

main.css

main.css

299 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

303 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

307 ms

css

css

146 ms

css

css

148 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

164 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

164 ms

element.js

element.js

145 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

51 ms

menu-2.css

menu-2.css

549 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

145 ms

menu-main2.css

menu-main2.css

469 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

466 ms

menu.js

menu.js

601 ms

css

css

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

107 ms

social_login.css

social_login.css

411 ms

mdb_compiled_theme.css

mdb_compiled_theme.css

604 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

118 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

487 ms

jquery-bundles1.js

jquery-bundles1.js

750 ms

mdb_carousal.js

mdb_carousal.js

490 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

113 ms

slider.js

slider.js

592 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

593 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

594 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

596 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

598 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

598 ms

main.js

main.js

738 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

739 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

738 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

739 ms

custom.js

custom.js

738 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

896 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

84 ms

css

css

15 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

85 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

214 ms

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

622 ms

load.gif

load.gif

622 ms

g97y4750513.jpg

g97y4750513.jpg

623 ms

ebgieUntitled-16.jpg

ebgieUntitled-16.jpg

623 ms

78ra1Untitled-16.jpg

78ra1Untitled-16.jpg

622 ms

l498o750.webp

l498o750.webp

733 ms

hr7xlife-science-750-513.webp

hr7xlife-science-750-513.webp

731 ms

yarxw750513.webp

yarxw750513.webp

732 ms

tap4a450-Recovered.jpg

tap4a450-Recovered.jpg

732 ms

h856l750.jpg

h856l750.jpg

732 ms

r4j9q7502.jpg

r4j9q7502.jpg

732 ms

9styq75.jpg

9styq75.jpg

734 ms

gkdw814a750.jpg

gkdw814a750.jpg

733 ms

optedreale7.jpg

optedreale7.jpg

735 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

105 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

548 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

131 ms

450x308_zfsF.webp

450x308_zfsF.webp

655 ms

collect

collect

83 ms

450x308_qYBE.jpg

450x308_qYBE.jpg

604 ms

450x308_xrXb.jpg

450x308_xrXb.jpg

602 ms

450x308_gcYp.jpg

450x308_gcYp.jpg

926 ms

450x308_Y7xe.jpg

450x308_Y7xe.jpg

926 ms

js

js

106 ms

450x308_42iY.jpg

450x308_42iY.jpg

905 ms

ads

ads

160 ms

container.html

container.html

151 ms

4bz9j20.jpg

4bz9j20.jpg

1095 ms

gzwef55.jpg

gzwef55.jpg

819 ms

450x308_e7Y2.jpg

450x308_e7Y2.jpg

817 ms

450x308_e89d.jpg

450x308_e89d.jpg

1093 ms

450x308_tnL2.jpg

450x308_tnL2.jpg

1092 ms

450x308_6bYW.jpg

450x308_6bYW.jpg

1089 ms

450x308_5F9Z.jpg

450x308_5F9Z.jpg

1089 ms

450x308_fd0W.jpg

450x308_fd0W.jpg

1085 ms

450x308_CLR0.jpg

450x308_CLR0.jpg

1333 ms

put.html

put.html

222 ms

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

325 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

1010 ms

x.png

x.png

1027 ms

mob-menu.png

mob-menu.png

1009 ms

16680343009399422064

16680343009399422064

694 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

695 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

696 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

18 ms

9522144818437642421

9522144818437642421

736 ms

icon.png

icon.png

741 ms

test.html

test.html

246 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

248 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

247 ms

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

537 ms

dwce_cheq_events

dwce_cheq_events

501 ms

ads

ads

94 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

203 ms

Accessibility Review

lifesciencesreview.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

lifesciencesreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifesciencesreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesciencesreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifesciencesreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifesciencesreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Sciences Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: