Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

lifesmith.com

Lifesmith Classic Fractals Home

Page Load Speed

13.9 sec in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

13.6 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

lifesmith.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifesmith.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifesmith content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifesmith.com

Art Company, Graphic Design, Fractal, Mathematics Tutoring, Graphic Arts, Poster Company, Licensing Artist

Visit lifesmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifesmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 13.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifesmith.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifesmith.com

156 ms

1.js

302 ms

js_data.php

391 ms

tinc

158 ms

tinc

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 344 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesmith.com, 19% (65 requests) were made to Sc01.alicdn.com and 15% (53 requests) were made to Img.alicdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.8 sec) relates to the external source G01.t.alicdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (27%)

Content Size

6.4 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifesmith.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 11.7 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 118.5 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifesmith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 489.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 448.7 kB

  • Original 619.4 kB
  • After minification 611.9 kB
  • After compression 170.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesmith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 448.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (23%)

Requests Now

317

After Optimization

244

The browser has sent 317 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifesmith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifesmith.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lifesmith.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

lifesmith.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifesmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifesmith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: