9.3 sec in total
2.7 sec
6.4 sec
165 ms
Visit lifesolution.org.au now to see the best up-to-date Life Solution content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifesolution.org.au
| Christian Church
Visit lifesolution.org.auWe analyzed Lifesolution.org.au page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
lifesolution.org.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.147
77/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
2683 ms
310 ms
297 ms
165 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesolution.org.au, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifesolution.org.au.
Page size can be reduced by 726.1 kB (72%)
1.0 MB
275.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifesolution.org.au main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 784.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Life Solution needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 608.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 608.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesolution.org.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (79%)
81
17
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Solution. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifesolution.org.au
2683 ms
jquery-1.5.js
310 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
297 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
165 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
165 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
178 ms
jquery.capSlide.js
162 ms
jquery.bgiframe.js
262 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
263 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
266 ms
jquery-css-transform.js
276 ms
jquery-animate-css-rotate-scale.js
338 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
338 ms
coin-slider.min.js
339 ms
mazine.js
347 ms
coin-slider-styles.css
389 ms
style.css
373 ms
thickbox.css
414 ms
wpsc-default.css
407 ms
compatibility.css
404 ms
styles.css
440 ms
jquery.js
520 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
461 ms
wp-e-commerce.js
566 ms
jquery.livequery.js
508 ms
user.js
498 ms
thickbox.js
512 ms
jquery.form.min.js
543 ms
scripts.js
579 ms
wp-embed.min.js
585 ms
fonts.css
217 ms
reset.css
216 ms
960.css
240 ms
styles.css
295 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
282 ms
jquery.tooltip.css
282 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
105 ms
back.png
158 ms
logo.png
196 ms
bullet.png
158 ms
cart_top.png
158 ms
cart_back.png
158 ms
cart_icon.png
160 ms
details.png
162 ms
cart_bottom.png
160 ms
inp_left.png
162 ms
inp_back.png
162 ms
search_but.png
202 ms
cont_left.png
212 ms
cont_right.png
231 ms
cont_back.png
731 ms
cont_sep_hov.png
732 ms
cont_left_hov.png
732 ms
cont_back_hov.png
729 ms
cont_sep.png
731 ms
pastor.jpg
732 ms
box_top_left.png
807 ms
box_top_right.png
804 ms
box_bot_left.png
814 ms
box_bot_right.png
804 ms
box_top.png
814 ms
box_bot.png
814 ms
box_right.png
873 ms
box_left.png
874 ms
list2_bul.png
875 ms
footer_cover.png
856 ms
foot_back.png
855 ms
_weQNDK6Uf40CiGFKBBUjp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
33 ms
COMMUNIS-webfont.woff
919 ms
74rNkO0_718VQPTEmPNsIvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
33 ms
likebox.php
181 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
46 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
51 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
59 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
88 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
55 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
45 ms
12742263_822595201203181_2680292065316186822_n.png
125 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
6 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
4 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
5 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
6 ms
lifesolution.org.au accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifesolution.org.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifesolution.org.au SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesolution.org.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifesolution.org.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifesolution.org.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Solution. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: