8.2 sec in total
1.7 sec
6.1 sec
421 ms
Visit lifestorynetwork.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Lifestorynetwork content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifestorynetwork.org.uk
dementia charity for carers in the UK campaigning and influencing dementia support policy services
Visit lifestorynetwork.org.ukWe analyzed Lifestorynetwork.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
lifestorynetwork.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value38.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
1721 ms
436 ms
271 ms
290 ms
358 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Lifestorynetwork.org.uk, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifestorynetwork.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 768.4 kB (70%)
1.1 MB
323.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifestorynetwork.org.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 480.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifestorynetwork needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 70% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 312.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 312.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 288.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifestorynetwork.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 288.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (78%)
76
17
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifestorynetwork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifestorynetwork.org.uk
1721 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
436 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
271 ms
testimonials-widget.css
290 ms
styles.css
358 ms
styles.css
271 ms
style.css
286 ms
themeroller-base.css
549 ms
style.css
495 ms
page-list.css
419 ms
easy-twitter-feed-widget.css
495 ms
style.css
548 ms
styles.css
578 ms
addtoany.min.css
611 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
762 ms
custom.css
1755 ms
styles.css
675 ms
smc_front.css
701 ms
wpgmza_style.css
750 ms
jquery.js
1108 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
908 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
975 ms
jquery.cookie.js
977 ms
jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.9.js
975 ms
text.js
1028 ms
jquery.form.min.js
994 ms
scripts.js
987 ms
jquery.pajinate.min.js
976 ms
pagination.js
1037 ms
jquery.t-countdown.js
1095 ms
small-menu.js
1095 ms
widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js
1089 ms
jquery.fullcalendar.min.js
1206 ms
jquery.simplemodal.1.4.3.min.js
1159 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1185 ms
jquery.jgrowl.min.js
1186 ms
core.min.js
1153 ms
datepicker.min.js
1242 ms
jquery.init_show_calendar.js
1173 ms
scripts.js
1181 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1104 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1167 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1179 ms
ditty-news-ticker.js
1680 ms
css
41 ms
logo.png
318 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
117 ms
BG_main.png
253 ms
BG_topbar.png
253 ms
icon_home.png
219 ms
BG_header.png
254 ms
icon_search.png
252 ms
home_nav_border.png
304 ms
TIDE_logo-011.jpg
337 ms
icon_knowledge.png
589 ms
icon_involved.png
587 ms
icon_sharing.png
337 ms
share_save_171_16.png
596 ms
facebook.png
1172 ms
rss.png
709 ms
twitter.png
594 ms
pixel.gif
107 ms
page.js
72 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcU3KvHLhcNjEHFQzwNtdMQY.ttf
63 ms
widgets.js
177 ms
sm13.html
102 ms
icons.15.svg.css
99 ms
ga.js
291 ms
analytics.js
305 ms
timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js
14 ms
syndication
118 ms
438666515521368065
145 ms
collect
16 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
17 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
17 ms
qdNiPEZ8_normal.jpeg
161 ms
e58fd2ac7a628f667ac9e33765f79e1f_normal.png
221 ms
jot
51 ms
lifestorynetwork.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lifestorynetwork.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifestorynetwork.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestorynetwork.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifestorynetwork.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifestorynetwork.org.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifestorynetwork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: