Tools & Wizards About Us
lifestylecx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lifestylecx.com

Lifestylecx - Waypoint

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

lifestylecx.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifestylecx.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifestylecx best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifestylecx.com

We have changed our brand name from AgingChoices Pro to Waypoint. We may have a new name, but we offer the same top conversion tools.

Visit lifestylecx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifestylecx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifestylecx.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifestylecx.com

37 ms

lifestylecx

30 ms

712 ms

js

107 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lifestylecx.com, 72% (53 requests) were made to Waypointconverts.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (712 ms) relates to the external source Waypointconverts.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.3 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifestylecx.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 857.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 65.0 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 111.4 kB
  • After minification 106.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifestylecx images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 857.4 kB
  • After minification 857.4 kB
  • After compression 806.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 198.7 kB
  • After minification 196.7 kB
  • After compression 162.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifestylecx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (92%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifestylecx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifestylecx.com

lifestylecx.com

37 ms

lifestylecx

lifestylecx

30 ms

712 ms

js

js

107 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

22 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

45 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

44 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

47 ms

helper-parts.min.css

helper-parts.min.css

53 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

54 ms

css

css

86 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

69 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

67 ms

typicon.min.css

typicon.min.css

74 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

82 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

85 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

84 ms

wow.css

wow.css

86 ms

talkie-style.css

talkie-style.css

91 ms

talkie-responsive.css

talkie-responsive.css

90 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

88 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

96 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

100 ms

post-626.css

post-626.css

102 ms

etww-frontend.min.css

etww-frontend.min.css

103 ms

global.css

global.css

104 ms

post-5794.css

post-5794.css

104 ms

css

css

101 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

72 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

59 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

99 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

138 ms

envo.js

envo.js

162 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

164 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

165 ms

lottie.js

lottie.js

164 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

164 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

58 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

173 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

174 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

172 ms

appear.js

appear.js

173 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

174 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

74 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

61 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

74 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

174 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

161 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

136 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

137 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

136 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

131 ms

wave.js

wave.js

121 ms

talkie-custom.js

talkie-custom.js

157 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

150 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

151 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

143 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

144 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

200 ms

css

css

67 ms

5b9c5388-ed3f-4c2f-9d2b-60eaff43475d

5b9c5388-ed3f-4c2f-9d2b-60eaff43475d

246 ms

WAYPOINT-LOGO-no-tag@2x.png

WAYPOINT-LOGO-no-tag@2x.png

151 ms

cropped-WP-icon-512.png

cropped-WP-icon-512.png

162 ms

cropped-Waypoint-Tag-1024x292.png

cropped-Waypoint-Tag-1024x292.png

162 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

20 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

26 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

30 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

36 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

245 ms

5b9c5388-ed3f-4c2f-9d2b-60eaff43475d

5b9c5388-ed3f-4c2f-9d2b-60eaff43475d

186 ms

navigator-launcher-bundle-1727865253.js

navigator-launcher-bundle-1727865253.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

lifestylecx.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lifestylecx.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifestylecx.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestylecx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifestylecx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifestylecx.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifestylecx. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: