3.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.2 sec
317 ms
Click here to check amazing Lifestyleport content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifestyleport.com
Visit lifestyleport.comWe analyzed Lifestyleport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lifestyleport.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
1239 ms
221 ms
110 ms
73 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Lifestyleport.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifestyleport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 471.9 kB (58%)
816.8 kB
345.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifestyleport.com main page is 816.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 291.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifestyleport needs image optimization as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 213.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 173.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifestyleport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 173.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (47%)
70
37
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifestyleport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifestyleport.com
1239 ms
jquery.min.js
221 ms
bootstrap.min.js
110 ms
custom.js
73 ms
switcher.js
72 ms
style-switch.css
83 ms
reset.css
85 ms
style.css
109 ms
horizontal.css
107 ms
slider.css
124 ms
bootstrap-combined.min.css
217 ms
bootstrap.css
144 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
143 ms
webticker.css
143 ms
side.js
165 ms
popupstyle.css
177 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
177 ms
footer.js
153 ms
jquery.webticker.js
183 ms
jquery.mobile-1.0rc2.customized.min.js
258 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
188 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
187 ms
diapo.js
259 ms
modernizr.js
258 ms
plugins.js
257 ms
sly.js
259 ms
horizontal.js
257 ms
mootools-yui-compressed.js
32 ms
body-bg.png
70 ms
logo.png
68 ms
header-ad_03.png
127 ms
5_slide.jpg
100 ms
3_slide.jpg
99 ms
2_slide.jpg
127 ms
5.jpg
99 ms
3.jpg
96 ms
2.jpg
126 ms
top-seprator.png
107 ms
bar-bg_03.png
108 ms
search-btn_06.png
109 ms
title_03.png
196 ms
readmore_03.png
200 ms
fb-black.png
160 ms
google-black.png
159 ms
Twitter-black.png
161 ms
Skype-black.png
165 ms
Linkedin-black.png
166 ms
Ubuntu-R.ttf
306 ms
fb-sidebar-plain.png
441 ms
controls.png
37 ms
likebox.php
189 ms
ticker-arrow_03.png
60 ms
ticker-left_06.png
60 ms
ticker-right_07.png
68 ms
play.png
68 ms
pause.png
98 ms
controls.png
99 ms
border.png
109 ms
loadingbackground.png
109 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
48 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
42 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
52 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
75 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
48 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
48 ms
576568_171751646354346_530240766_n.jpg
102 ms
1383989_171757059687138_928867541_n.jpg
48 ms
944947_670765293065748_2340001255420817750_n.jpg
133 ms
935151_546592815448499_825342024_n.jpg
76 ms
10689658_424156184414366_4440021227744574740_n.jpg
51 ms
11707574_1623380517882487_3803979039009484685_n.jpg
14 ms
12112168_538834109609184_5071681122823733827_n.jpg
18 ms
12552873_581251695372210_7946310709678256925_n.jpg
31 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
8 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
6 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
2 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
5 ms
lifestyleport.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
lifestyleport.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
lifestyleport.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestyleport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifestyleport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifestyleport.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifestyleport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: