Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lifetimedoor.net

Garage Door Service - Serving Southern WI Since 1964 - Honest Pricing

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

305 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

lifetimedoor.net screenshot

About Website

Visit lifetimedoor.net now to see the best up-to-date Lifetime Door content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifetimedoor.net

A garage door service you can trust with affordable flat-rate pricing & no hidden fees. We carry only the finest garage doors & parts at honest prices.

Visit lifetimedoor.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifetimedoor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifetimedoor.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.177

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifetimedoor.net

305 ms

public-main.js

45 ms

public-main.js

96 ms

gtm.js

113 ms

js

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Lifetimedoor.net, 30% (29 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1000 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifetimedoor.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (15%)

Content Size

18.6 MB

After Optimization

15.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifetimedoor.net main page is 18.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 17.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 476.8 kB

  • Original 554.7 kB
  • After minification 548.7 kB
  • After compression 77.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 476.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 17.8 MB
  • After minification 15.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifetime Door needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 225.9 kB
  • After minification 225.9 kB
  • After compression 224.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 24.6 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifetimedoor.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (36%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifetime Door. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifetimedoor.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifetimedoor.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lifetimedoor.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifetimedoor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifetimedoor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifetime Door. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: