Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

liforte.com

Liforte .JSC | Web design | SEO | Mobile Application|Game | Application Develop

Page Load Speed

46 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

44.7 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

liforte.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Liforte content for Vietnam. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liforte.com

We design, develop, integrate and maintain Applications that help companies solve complicated and crucial business problems. We are a global IT solutions company and an offshore IT services provider. ...

Visit liforte.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Liforte.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 44.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

liforte.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.103

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

liforte.com

1178 ms

styleChung.css

291 ms

style.css

560 ms

video.css

570 ms

component.css

572 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Liforte.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) belongs to the original domain Liforte.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 223.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

906.8 kB

After Optimization

683.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Liforte.com main page is 906.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 429.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 326.9 kB
  • After minification 252.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Liforte needs image optimization as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 429.1 kB
  • After minification 426.5 kB
  • After compression 363.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 96.0 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 54.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liforte.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (60%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liforte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

liforte.com accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

liforte.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

liforte.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liforte.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Liforte.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liforte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: