Tools & Wizards About Us
liftingindex.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

liftingindex.com

Movimentazione Manuale dei Carichi Software Ergonomia OSTools: Metodo OCRA Check List OCRA MAPO Ergonomia NIOSH REBA RULA

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

366 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

307 ms

liftingindex.com screenshot

About Website

Visit liftingindex.com now to see the best up-to-date Liftingindex content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liftingindex.com

Software Ergonomia OSTools: Movimentazione Manuale dei Carichi Metodo OCRA Check List OCRA NIOSH MAPO REBA RULA

Visit liftingindex.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Liftingindex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liftingindex.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.159

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

liftingindex.com

366 ms

www.liftingindex.com

377 ms

www.liftingindex.com

491 ms

bootstrap.min.css

130 ms

style.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Liftingindex.com, 16% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (795 ms) belongs to the original domain Liftingindex.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

210.7 kB

After Optimization

164.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Liftingindex.com main page is 210.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 43.8 kB

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 135.2 kB
  • After minification 135.2 kB
  • After compression 134.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liftingindex.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liftingindex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

liftingindex.com

liftingindex.com

366 ms

www.liftingindex.com

www.liftingindex.com

377 ms

www.liftingindex.com

www.liftingindex.com

491 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

130 ms

style.css

style.css

270 ms

default.css

default.css

376 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

517 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

434 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

432 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

434 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

437 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

539 ms

in.js

in.js

795 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

image-banner-031.webp

image-banner-031.webp

393 ms

js

js

46 ms

js

js

107 ms

software-ergonomia-checklist-ocra-epitrocleite.webp

software-ergonomia-checklist-ocra-epitrocleite.webp

611 ms

software-niosh-valutazione-movimentazione-carichi.webp

software-niosh-valutazione-movimentazione-carichi.webp

609 ms

software-ocra-valutazione-compiti-ripetitivi.webp

software-ocra-valutazione-compiti-ripetitivi.webp

611 ms

js

js

233 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

294 ms

carica-scripts.html

carica-scripts.html

332 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

software-mapo-valutazione-movimentazione-pazienti.webp

software-mapo-valutazione-movimentazione-pazienti.webp

711 ms

Accessibility Review

liftingindex.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

liftingindex.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

liftingindex.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liftingindex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liftingindex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

liftingindex.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liftingindex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: