Tools & Wizards About Us
lightcatch.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lightcatch.net

Lightcatch | Stop Crime Before It Happens Over 1000% Better

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

822 ms

Page Rendered

193 ms

lightcatch.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lightcatch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightcatch.net

After creating the world’s leading crime prevention app, we saw thousands of cases where frustrated property crime victims ended up with nothing. 'What can I do to stop this?’ became the founder’s dri...

Visit lightcatch.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightcatch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightcatch.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lightcatch.net

130 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

54 ms

pagecloud.runtime.js

67 ms

pagecloud.reset.css

102 ms

pagecloud.common.css

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lightcatch.net, 29% (7 requests) were made to App-assets.pagecloud.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Gfonts.pagecloud.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (354 ms) relates to the external source Img.pagecloud.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

394.1 kB

After Optimization

287.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lightcatch.net main page is 394.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 153.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 103.4 kB

  • Original 123.7 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 112.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lightcatch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 175 B

  • Original 153.2 kB
  • After minification 153.2 kB
  • After compression 153.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 41 B

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightcatch.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (70%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightcatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lightcatch.net

www.lightcatch.net

130 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

54 ms

pagecloud.runtime.js

pagecloud.runtime.js

67 ms

pagecloud.reset.css

pagecloud.reset.css

102 ms

pagecloud.common.css

pagecloud.common.css

94 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

866534950503357

866534950503357

108 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

112 ms

css

css

121 ms

css

css

174 ms

css

css

163 ms

js

js

118 ms

css

css

158 ms

pagecloud.navigation.js

pagecloud.navigation.js

82 ms

pagecloud.sections.js

pagecloud.sections.js

87 ms

pagecloud.analytics.js

pagecloud.analytics.js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

211 ms

image-5a9e0.png

image-5a9e0.png

330 ms

check.png

check.png

314 ms

7_Community_Help_Support_2.png

7_Community_Help_Support_2.png

286 ms

Twocirclesupdates.png

Twocirclesupdates.png

354 ms

85 ms

fs.js

fs.js

49 ms

33 ms

Accessibility Review

lightcatch.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lightcatch.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lightcatch.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightcatch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightcatch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lightcatch.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lightcatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: