10.1 sec in total
466 ms
6.2 sec
3.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Lightem Systems content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightemsystems.com
Visit lightemsystems.comWe analyzed Lightemsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lightemsystems.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.8 s
0/100
10%
Value21.2 s
0/100
25%
Value21.6 s
0/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value24.8 s
0/100
10%
466 ms
100 ms
114 ms
191 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Lightemsystems.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Static.searchiq.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (57%)
2.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Lightemsystems.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lightem Systems images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 143.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightemsystems.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (79%)
73
15
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightem Systems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lightemsystems.com
466 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
style.min.css
114 ms
search-filter.min.css
191 ms
style.min.css
149 ms
theme.min.css
198 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
178 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
139 ms
frontend.min.css
153 ms
animate.css
281 ms
sliders.min.css
191 ms
icomoon.css
191 ms
lae-frontend.css
192 ms
lae-grid.css
203 ms
lae-widgets.min.css
291 ms
frontend.min.css
454 ms
all.min.css
202 ms
v4-shims.min.css
221 ms
general.min.css
236 ms
css
90 ms
opensanshebrew.css
97 ms
fontawesome.min.css
227 ms
solid.min.css
252 ms
regular.min.css
306 ms
jquery.min.js
307 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
307 ms
search-filter-elementor.js
293 ms
v4-shims.min.js
297 ms
animations.min.css
291 ms
css
88 ms
general.min.js
294 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
295 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
303 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
316 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
316 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
323 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
331 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
341 ms
hooks.min.js
346 ms
i18n.min.js
334 ms
frontend.min.js
339 ms
waypoints.min.js
326 ms
core.min.js
300 ms
swiper.min.js
1496 ms
share-link.min.js
275 ms
dialog.min.js
280 ms
frontend.min.js
290 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1429 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1429 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1428 ms
underscore.min.js
1421 ms
wp-util.min.js
1413 ms
frontend.min.js
1394 ms
siq-container-2.js
1183 ms
f37ebbea1f4318dec775a4d705bd7cca.gif
1172 ms
maps
973 ms
cropped-LS_final-Logo.png
743 ms
Lightem-Systems.png
885 ms
Final01.jpg
855 ms
danist-58MKf-UXjaA-unsplash.jpg
816 ms
telecom-homepage-banner.jpg
770 ms
homepage-security-banner.jpg
771 ms
audio-homepage-banner.jpg
816 ms
catv-homepage-banner.jpg
874 ms
google_play_store-oo1r0r4sc1ebpyfeb7semh518w7d6ja9rw59dkflo4.png
873 ms
OpenSansHebrew-BoldItalic.woff
449 ms
OpenSansHebrew-ExtraBoldItalic.woff
575 ms
OpenSansHebrew-Italic.woff
667 ms
OpenSansHebrew-LightItalic.woff
994 ms
OpenSansHebrew-Bold.woff
993 ms
OpenSansHebrew-ExtraBold.woff
991 ms
OpenSansHebrew-Regular.woff
995 ms
OpenSansHebrew-Light.woff
998 ms
eicons.woff
740 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
727 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
665 ms
pxl.gif
1168 ms
settings.js
1070 ms
embed
2480 ms
sa.js
117 ms
autocomplete.js
131 ms
search-results.js
123 ms
live
171 ms
autocomplete.css
46 ms
custom.css
282 ms
js
31 ms
lightemsystems.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lightemsystems.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lightemsystems.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightemsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightemsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightemsystems.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lightem Systems. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: