4.8 sec in total
358 ms
3.8 sec
657 ms
Visit lightingline.eu now to see the best up-to-date Lighting Line content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lightingline.eu
Lighting Line specializes in the supply of aluminium profiles for LED lighting feature a original Italian design at best prices on the market.
Visit lightingline.euWe analyzed Lightingline.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lightingline.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value1.109
1/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
358 ms
707 ms
800 ms
446 ms
357 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Lightingline.eu, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lightingline.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 452.3 kB (16%)
2.8 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Lightingline.eu main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lighting Line images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 280.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightingline.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 280.6 kB or 95% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)
84
34
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lighting Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lightingline.eu
358 ms
lightingline.eu
707 ms
wpo-minify-header-a830dc7a.min.css
800 ms
jquery.min.js
446 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
357 ms
js
79 ms
css
35 ms
wpo-minify-footer-e0971b8d.min.css
377 ms
hooks.min.js
344 ms
i18n.min.js
364 ms
index.js
365 ms
index.js
450 ms
rbtools.min.js
818 ms
rs6.min.js
891 ms
share.min.js
484 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.min.js
497 ms
functions.min.js
561 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
817 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
616 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
671 ms
js.cookie.min.js
817 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
818 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
844 ms
sticky-kit.min.js
844 ms
functions.min.js
889 ms
tooltipsy.min.js
889 ms
jarallax.min.js
953 ms
jquery.bigtext.min.js
953 ms
bigtext.min.js
954 ms
googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js
970 ms
api.js
50 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1004 ms
index.js
1005 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1041 ms
effect.min.js
1083 ms
jquery.parallax-scroll.min.js
1083 ms
daeron.js
1091 ms
wp-consent-api.min.js
1206 ms
complianz.min.js
1206 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1205 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
1206 ms
sliders.min.js
964 ms
vivus.min.js
979 ms
vivus.min.js
974 ms
jquery.fittext.min.js
955 ms
fittext.min.js
954 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
941 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
869 ms
masonry.min.js
844 ms
aos.js
882 ms
loadposts.min.js
836 ms
wow.min.js
773 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
727 ms
sdk.js
62 ms
gtm.js
59 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
582 ms
sbi-sprite.png
1072 ms
logo-overlay-loading.png
788 ms
Lighting_Line_logo_light.png
789 ms
Lighting_Line_logo_dark.png
765 ms
banner-home-5.jpg
946 ms
banner-home-1.jpg
946 ms
sdk.js
12 ms
dripicons-v2.woff
718 ms
Linearicons-Free.woff
899 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
999 ms
banner-home-6.jpg
1014 ms
dummy.png
836 ms
Socicon.ttf
821 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1008 ms
about-us-home.jpg
884 ms
aluminium-profile-home.jpg
926 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
51 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
165 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
166 ms
orizzonte-home.jpg
925 ms
contact-us-home.jpg
885 ms
01-surface-2.jpg
1027 ms
02-recessed-1.jpg
936 ms
03-corner-1.jpg
1060 ms
04-wall.jpg
948 ms
05-suspension-1.jpg
990 ms
06-drywall-1.jpg
885 ms
07-round-1.jpg
862 ms
08-furniture.jpg
1005 ms
logo_social.png
923 ms
placeholder.png
945 ms
footer-banner-1.jpg
951 ms
432179358_1167568537925664_3919662664282315989_nlow.jpg
471 ms
431474406_1063553171603216_2870122817617403424_nlow.jpg
394 ms
396160986_1285605052116136_5152093075940573774_nlow.jpg
417 ms
basic_pencil_ruler.svg
138 ms
software_pencil.svg
133 ms
ecommerce_cart.svg
142 ms
basic_clessidre.svg
138 ms
lightingline.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lightingline.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lightingline.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightingline.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightingline.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightingline.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lighting Line. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: