Tools & Wizards About Us
lightingtechnologiesinc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

Commercial Lighting Contractor I Atlanta GA I Lighting Technologies

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

lightingtechnologiesinc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lightingtechnologiesinc.com now to see the best up-to-date Lighting Technologies Inc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lightingtechnologiesinc.com

Atlanta Lighting Technologies offers commercial lighting service, installation, repair and LED upgrades in Georgia, Alabama & Tennessee. Call (678) 945-0467 to learn more.

Visit lightingtechnologiesinc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightingtechnologiesinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightingtechnologiesinc.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

219 ms

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

366 ms

modernizr

138 ms

css

668 ms

LightTechnology.js

362 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Lightingtechnologiesinc.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lightingtechnologiesinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 621.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lightingtechnologiesinc.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

  • Original 45.0 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 477.4 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lighting Technologies Inc needs image optimization as it can save up to 477.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 104.5 kB

  • Original 368.7 kB
  • After minification 361.3 kB
  • After compression 264.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightingtechnologiesinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (17%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lighting Technologies Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

219 ms

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

366 ms

modernizr

modernizr

138 ms

css

css

668 ms

LightTechnology.js

LightTechnology.js

362 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

js

js

94 ms

MsAjaxJs

MsAjaxJs

492 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

634 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

371 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

302 ms

WebFormsJs

WebFormsJs

575 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

109 ms

LT_VideoPlayButton.svg

LT_VideoPlayButton.svg

110 ms

LT_SlideShowPauseButton.svg

LT_SlideShowPauseButton.svg

1347 ms

LT_SlideShowPlayButton.svg

LT_SlideShowPlayButton.svg

2255 ms

LT_RadioButton_Inactive.png

LT_RadioButton_Inactive.png

108 ms

LT_RadioButton_Active.png

LT_RadioButton_Active.png

185 ms

LT_RadioButton_Null.png

LT_RadioButton_Null.png

186 ms

LT_Large_LeftArrow_Inactive.png

LT_Large_LeftArrow_Inactive.png

206 ms

LT_Large_LeftArrow_Active.png

LT_Large_LeftArrow_Active.png

205 ms

LT_Large_RightArrow_Inactive.svg

LT_Large_RightArrow_Inactive.svg

2445 ms

LT_Large_RightArrow_Active.svg

LT_Large_RightArrow_Active.svg

2171 ms

LT_Small_LeftArrow_Inactive.png

LT_Small_LeftArrow_Inactive.png

279 ms

LT_Small_LeftArrow_Active.png

LT_Small_LeftArrow_Active.png

280 ms

LT_Small_RightArrow_Inactive.png

LT_Small_RightArrow_Inactive.png

356 ms

LT_Small_RightArrow_Active.png

LT_Small_RightArrow_Active.png

352 ms

LT_Help_Open.svg

LT_Help_Open.svg

2884 ms

LT_Navigation_Open.jpg

LT_Navigation_Open.jpg

444 ms

LT_Help_Close.svg

LT_Help_Close.svg

2865 ms

LT_Navigation_Close.jpg

LT_Navigation_Close.jpg

1426 ms

LT_Logo_278x106.svg

LT_Logo_278x106.svg

1504 ms

LT_Large_RightArrow_Active.png

LT_Large_RightArrow_Active.png

1577 ms

CCCOC_Logo.jpg

CCCOC_Logo.jpg

1651 ms

IES_Logo.jpg

IES_Logo.jpg

1720 ms

NALMCO_Logo.jpg

NALMCO_Logo.jpg

1794 ms

PLASMA_Logo.jpg

PLASMA_Logo.jpg

1876 ms

LT_CreditCardInfo.png

LT_CreditCardInfo.png

1971 ms

LT_NeedHelpField_SendButton_Inactive.png

LT_NeedHelpField_SendButton_Inactive.png

2051 ms

LT_Home_Slide1.jpg

LT_Home_Slide1.jpg

2545 ms

LT_Home_Slide2.jpg

LT_Home_Slide2.jpg

2854 ms

LT_Home_Slide3.jpg

LT_Home_Slide3.jpg

2943 ms

LT_Home_Slide4.jpg

LT_Home_Slide4.jpg

3133 ms

LT_Home_Slide5.jpg

LT_Home_Slide5.jpg

2908 ms

LT_Home_Slide6.jpg

LT_Home_Slide6.jpg

3483 ms

CCCOC_Logo.svg

CCCOC_Logo.svg

3742 ms

IES_Logo.svg

IES_Logo.svg

3710 ms

NALMCO_Logo.svg

NALMCO_Logo.svg

3335 ms

PLASMA_Logo.svg

PLASMA_Logo.svg

3515 ms

LinkedInLogo_42x42.png

LinkedInLogo_42x42.png

3172 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

62 ms

YouTubeLogo_42x42.png

YouTubeLogo_42x42.png

3248 ms

fallback

fallback

29 ms

FacebookLogo_42x42.png

FacebookLogo_42x42.png

3233 ms

LT_Navigation_Slider_Background.jpg

LT_Navigation_Slider_Background.jpg

3377 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

LT_Help_Slider_Background.jpg

LT_Help_Slider_Background.jpg

3287 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

4 ms

css

css

28 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

3 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

15 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

18 ms

Accessibility Review

lightingtechnologiesinc.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lightingtechnologiesinc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lightingtechnologiesinc.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightingtechnologiesinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightingtechnologiesinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lightingtechnologiesinc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lighting Technologies Inc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: