Tools & Wizards About Us
lightmail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lightmail.com

LightMail | Electronic Signatures & Emails for Insurance Agents

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

619 ms

Page Rendered

468 ms

lightmail.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lightmail.com now to see the best up-to-date Light Mail content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lightmail.com

Get e-signatures on insurance policies and forms, send insurance-related emails, and build insurance documents online. Sign up and start sending today with a free trial.

Visit lightmail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightmail.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lightmail.com

88 ms

lightmail.com

104 ms

font-awesome.css

100 ms

site.v1657656353.css

50 ms

email-ui-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lightmail.com, 60% (12 requests) were made to D1lawbwczeq8t9.cloudfront.net and 10% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (198 ms) belongs to the original domain Lightmail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

419.9 kB

After Optimization

317.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lightmail.com main page is 419.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 255.6 kB
  • After minification 248.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Light Mail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 78.7 kB

  • Original 120.8 kB
  • After minification 117.9 kB
  • After compression 42.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Light Mail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

lightmail.com

lightmail.com

88 ms

lightmail.com

lightmail.com

104 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

100 ms

site.v1657656353.css

site.v1657656353.css

50 ms

email-ui-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

email-ui-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

55 ms

email-sales-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

email-sales-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

55 ms

email-text-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

email-text-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

57 ms

document-ui-screenshot-422x250.v1412393620.png

document-ui-screenshot-422x250.v1412393620.png

56 ms

document-preview-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

document-preview-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

55 ms

document-workflow-screenshot-422x250.v1412393620.png

document-workflow-screenshot-422x250.v1412393620.png

56 ms

esign-dashboard-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

esign-dashboard-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

57 ms

esign-edit-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

esign-edit-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

58 ms

esign-sign-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

esign-sign-screenshot-422x250.v1412393621.png

58 ms

lightmail-logo.v1412393622.png

lightmail-logo.v1412393622.png

23 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

laptop.v1412393621.png

laptop.v1412393621.png

16 ms

mulish.ttf

mulish.ttf

198 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

23 ms

js

js

63 ms

Accessibility Review

lightmail.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lightmail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lightmail.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lightmail.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Light Mail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: