Tools & Wizards About Us
lightobject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lightobject.com

LightObject | Professional Laser Cutters and Engravers | Lasers Cutters | Hybrid Laser Cutters | Engraving Machines | DIY Laser Cutters | Water Chille...

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

369 ms

lightobject.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Light Object content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightobject.com

From entry level to professional, our experienced staff and user friendly laser machines & cutter will help you in cutting, engraving, and etching!

Visit lightobject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightobject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightobject.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.435

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lightobject.com

108 ms

lightobject.com

422 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

91 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

82 ms

css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lightobject.com, 37% (15 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (550 ms) relates to the external source Api.goaffpro.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.8 kB (19%)

Content Size

748.3 kB

After Optimization

607.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lightobject.com main page is 748.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 472.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 139.5 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 864 B

  • Original 472.9 kB
  • After minification 472.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Light Object images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 350 B

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 114.9 kB
  • After compression 114.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (52%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Light Object. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lightobject.com

lightobject.com

108 ms

lightobject.com

lightobject.com

422 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

91 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

theme-bundle.head_async.js

82 ms

css

css

80 ms

theme-bundle.font.js

theme-bundle.font.js

146 ms

theme-c3ea2870-a8f2-013c-14d2-0a2ccc349b86.css

theme-c3ea2870-a8f2-013c-14d2-0a2ccc349b86.css

132 ms

js

js

147 ms

loader.js

loader.js

146 ms

firewall.js

firewall.js

391 ms

theme-bundle.main.js

theme-bundle.main.js

143 ms

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

142 ms

platform.js

platform.js

76 ms

visitor_stencil.js

visitor_stencil.js

142 ms

loader.js

loader.js

550 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

403 ms

js

js

54 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

21 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVspcBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVspcBO5Xo.woff

40 ms

collect

collect

136 ms

nobot

nobot

134 ms

88 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

88 ms

logo200_1698686263__25679.original.jpg

logo200_1698686263__25679.original.jpg

40 ms

machine-banner4__64430.jpg

machine-banner4__64430.jpg

76 ms

laser-machines-block2.jpg

laser-machines-block2.jpg

72 ms

water-chiller-block.jpg

water-chiller-block.jpg

70 ms

laser-machines-selection-icon2.jpg

laser-machines-selection-icon2.jpg

73 ms

diy-accessories-block.jpg

diy-accessories-block.jpg

74 ms

loading.svg

loading.svg

74 ms

design-slide.jpg

design-slide.jpg

77 ms

widget

widget

465 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

10 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

47 ms

7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s51oq.woff

7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s51oq.woff

50 ms

89 ms

index.php

index.php

133 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

badge

badge

119 ms

googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png

googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png

8 ms

Accessibility Review

lightobject.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lightobject.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lightobject.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightobject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightobject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lightobject.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Light Object. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: