21.5 sec in total
10.4 sec
10.9 sec
236 ms
Click here to check amazing Lightoftheword content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightoftheword.org
Visit lightoftheword.orgWe analyzed Lightoftheword.org page load time and found that the first response time was 10.4 sec and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lightoftheword.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value17.0 s
0/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value17,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.234
53/100
15%
Value28.7 s
0/100
10%
10388 ms
50 ms
51 ms
91 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Lightoftheword.org, 10% (7 requests) were made to W.soundcloud.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lightoftheword.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (52%)
2.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lightoftheword.org main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 855.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lightoftheword needs image optimization as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 461.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 563.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightoftheword.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 563.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (63%)
63
23
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightoftheword. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lightoftheword.org
10388 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
50 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
51 ms
compiled-css-core.css
91 ms
compiled-css-sections.css
55 ms
main.min.css
59 ms
jquery-ui-1.11.4.custom.css
79 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
81 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
113 ms
wpv-pagination.css
83 ms
ubermenu.min.css
114 ms
blackwhite2.css
112 ms
font-awesome.min.css
116 ms
jetpack.css
120 ms
css
25 ms
default.css
118 ms
jquery.js
157 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
133 ms
main.min.js
134 ms
LOTW_Logo_179x126.png
86 ms
facebook.png
37 ms
youtube.png
38 ms
email.png
40 ms
LOTW-Web-Header-2015.jpg
190 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
8 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
11 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
19 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
19 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
69 ms
css
15 ms
iOS-Button.png
33 ms
Android-Button.png
32 ms
Podcast-Button.png
34 ms
Contact-Button.png
32 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
52 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
3 ms
Video-Box1.jpg
85 ms
Audio-Box2.jpg
83 ms
know_god_grid.jpg
59 ms
Devotionals-Box3.jpg
81 ms
photon.js
52 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
47 ms
script.bootstrap.min.js
51 ms
pl.helpers.js
53 ms
script.fitvids.js
52 ms
pl.common.js
51 ms
script.flexslider.js
70 ms
core.min.js
72 ms
datepicker.min.js
73 ms
LOTW_Logo_200x141.png
114 ms
278 ms
283 ms
280 ms
277 ms
301 ms
cbp-loading.gif
67 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
85 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
67 ms
underscore.min.js
67 ms
wp-util.min.js
67 ms
backbone.min.js
108 ms
wp-playlist.js
111 ms
wpv-pagination-embedded.js
112 ms
js
66 ms
ubermenu.min.js
127 ms
wp-embed.min.js
99 ms
e-201611.js
22 ms
g.gif
12 ms
interstate-0ab59479718c8235122cad6b16a66953d725c43a.css
199 ms
widget-0511d506.css
69 ms
widget-d9304090.js
104 ms
lightoftheword.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
lightoftheword.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lightoftheword.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightoftheword.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lightoftheword.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightoftheword.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lightoftheword. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: