2.7 sec in total
222 ms
2.2 sec
236 ms
Visit lightroomforums.net now to see the best up-to-date Lightroom Forums content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lightroomforums.net
Forum dedicated to the support of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (previously known as Lightroom Forums)
Visit lightroomforums.netWe analyzed Lightroomforums.net page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lightroomforums.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
62/100
10%
Value6.2 s
12/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
222 ms
271 ms
155 ms
138 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Lightroomforums.net, 14% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to P.skimresources.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Syndication.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 331.2 kB (66%)
504.3 kB
173.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lightroomforums.net main page is 504.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 409.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 985 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lightroom Forums images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 272.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 272.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightroom Forums. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lightroomforums.net
222 ms
css.php
271 ms
css.php
155 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
138 ms
xenforo.js
181 ms
55662X1322595.skimlinks.js
23 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
avatar_male_s.png
178 ms
18443.jpg
175 ms
35506.jpg
175 ms
37581.jpg
173 ms
lrf-logo.png
177 ms
category-23px-light.png
162 ms
xenforo-ui-sprite.png
163 ms
node-sprite.png
165 ms
form-button-white-25px.png
165 ms
navigation-tab.png
163 ms
clear.png
166 ms
px.gif
132 ms
128 ms
client:plusone.js
119 ms
sdk.js
164 ms
widgets.js
130 ms
px.gif
27 ms
collect
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
115 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
148 ms
fastbutton
192 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
41 ms
174 ms
xd_arbiter.php
146 ms
xd_arbiter.php
292 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
91 ms
postmessageRelay
96 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
45 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
48 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
111 ms
api.js
38 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
86 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
76 ms
p.skimresources.com
34 ms
jot
1111 ms
link
35 ms
track.php
9 ms
lightroomforums.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lightroomforums.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lightroomforums.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightroomforums.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightroomforums.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightroomforums.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lightroom Forums. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: