6 sec in total
2.4 sec
3.5 sec
57 ms
Welcome to lightship.dk homepage info - get ready to check Lightship best content right away, or after learning these important things about lightship.dk
Lightship Chartering is a leading global shipbroker and commodity freight management specialist.
Visit lightship.dkWe analyzed Lightship.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lightship.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
2383 ms
52 ms
49 ms
464 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lightship.dk, 26% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Lightshipchartering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 380.5 kB (52%)
728.7 kB
348.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lightship.dk main page is 728.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 477.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 374.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 374.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lightship needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 80 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)
22
12
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightship. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lightshipchartering.com
2383 ms
minified.js
52 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
49 ms
polyfill.min.js
464 ms
thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js
98 ms
main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js
98 ms
lodash.min.js
97 ms
react.production.min.js
97 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
98 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
98 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
98 ms
LS-22.png
233 ms
f0ffb4_8fb41e42c6ec4cdeaef24d1917e37c94f000.jpg
285 ms
GettyImages-1412529920.jpg
440 ms
GettyImages-1364834632.jpg
412 ms
f0ffb4_b860a092e2094649a0443bad342b92fa~mv2.jpg
392 ms
f0ffb4_bba002fbf071490c909323e58e048042~mv2.png
315 ms
LS-22.png
340 ms
bundle.min.js
102 ms
file.woff
94 ms
file.woff
94 ms
file.woff
113 ms
9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff
10 ms
file.woff
128 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
9 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
18 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
19 ms
file.woff
234 ms
149 ms
138 ms
140 ms
124 ms
133 ms
133 ms
127 ms
134 ms
131 ms
128 ms
139 ms
138 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
17 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
lightship.dk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lightship.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lightship.dk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightship.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightship.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightship.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lightship. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: