2 sec in total
642 ms
1.1 sec
230 ms
Visit likestagram.com now to see the best up-to-date Likestagram content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about likestagram.com
Visit likestagram.comWe analyzed Likestagram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 642 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
likestagram.com performance score
642 ms
45 ms
109 ms
124 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Likestagram.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (642 ms) belongs to the original domain Likestagram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (55%)
1.8 MB
813.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Likestagram.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 782.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Likestagram needs image optimization as it can save up to 259.2 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 447.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 260.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Likestagram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (76%)
70
17
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Likestagram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
likestagram.com
642 ms
cloudflare.min.js
45 ms
css
109 ms
css
124 ms
css
124 ms
styles.css
41 ms
tc_shortCodes.css
43 ms
flexslider.css
44 ms
dashicons.min.css
78 ms
reviewer-public.css
92 ms
woo-shop.css
90 ms
normalize.min.css
31 ms
style.css
71 ms
responsive.css
73 ms
isotope.css
83 ms
flexslider.css
73 ms
font-awesome.css
82 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
84 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
84 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
86 ms
superslides.css
87 ms
jquery.js
90 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
96 ms
jquery.form.min.js
83 ms
scripts.js
87 ms
scripts.js
86 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
86 ms
scripts.js
90 ms
api.js
92 ms
jquery.nouislider.all.min.js
89 ms
jquery.knob.js
89 ms
reviewer.public.min.js
89 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
90 ms
fitvids.min.js
95 ms
backstretch.js
95 ms
placeholder.js
94 ms
mosaic.1.0.1.min.js
93 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
229 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
226 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
227 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
264 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
214 ms
cleantabs.jquery.js
216 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
212 ms
jquery.superslides.js
218 ms
hammer.js
220 ms
jquery.specialevent.hammer.js
218 ms
global_functions.js
217 ms
scripts.js
209 ms
comment-reply.min.js
208 ms
wp-embed.min.js
210 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
194 ms
ga.js
109 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
recaptcha__en.js
270 ms
img.gif
83 ms
likestagramlogo1.png
91 ms
1-home4.png
84 ms
2-home1.png
86 ms
4-home1.png
86 ms
1-sub.png
86 ms
2-sub.png
93 ms
3-sub.png
90 ms
4-sub.png
88 ms
5-sub.png
91 ms
rating-star.png
86 ms
totop.png
89 ms
hamburger@2x.png
178 ms
bullets-webfont.woff
162 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
163 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
162 ms
collect
40 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
likestagram.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Likestagram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Likestagram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
likestagram.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Likestagram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: